Skip to content
← Back to explorer

EditReward: A Human-Aligned Reward Model for Instruction-Guided Image Editing

Keming Wu, Sicong Jiang, Max Ku, Ping Nie, Minghao Liu, Wenhu Chen · Sep 30, 2025 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

High trust

Use this as a practical starting point for protocol research, then validate against the original paper.

Best use

Secondary protocol comparison source

What to verify

Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.

Evidence quality

High

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

Recently, we have witnessed great progress in image editing with natural language instructions. Several closed-source models like GPT-Image-1, Seedream, and Google-Nano-Banana have shown highly promising progress. However, the open-source models are still lagging. The main bottleneck is the lack of a reliable reward model to scale up high-quality synthetic training data. To address this critical bottleneck, we built EditReward, trained with our new large-scale human preference dataset, meticulously annotated by trained experts following a rigorous protocol containing over 200K preference pairs. EditReward demonstrates superior alignment with human preferences in instruction-guided image editing tasks. Experiments show that EditReward achieves state-of-the-art human correlation on established benchmarks such as GenAI-Bench, AURORA-Bench, ImagenHub, and our new EditReward-Bench, outperforming a wide range of VLM-as-judge models. Furthermore, we use EditReward to select a high-quality subset from the existing noisy ShareGPT-4o-Image dataset. We train Step1X-Edit on the selected subset, which shows significant improvement over training on the full set. This demonstrates EditReward's ability to serve as a reward model to scale up high-quality training data for image editing. Furthermore, its strong alignment suggests potential for advanced applications like reinforcement learning-based post-training and test-time scaling of image editing models. EditReward with its training dataset will be released to help the community build more high-quality image editing training datasets.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper has useful evaluation signal, but protocol completeness is partial; pair it with related papers before deciding implementation strategy.

Best use

Secondary protocol comparison source

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

Main weakness

No major weakness surfaced.

Trust level

High

Usefulness score

67/100 • Medium

Useful as a secondary reference; validate protocol details against neighboring papers.

Human Feedback Signal

Detected

Evaluation Signal

Detected

Usefulness for eval research

Moderate-confidence candidate

Extraction confidence 75%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

strong

Pairwise Preference

Directly usable for protocol triage.

"Recently, we have witnessed great progress in image editing with natural language instructions."

Evaluation Modes

strong

Llm As Judge

Includes extracted eval setup.

"Recently, we have witnessed great progress in image editing with natural language instructions."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Recently, we have witnessed great progress in image editing with natural language instructions."

Benchmarks / Datasets

strong

Genai Bench, Aurora Bench, Editreward Bench

Useful for quick benchmark comparison.

"Experiments show that EditReward achieves state-of-the-art human correlation on established benchmarks such as GenAI-Bench, AURORA-Bench, ImagenHub, and our new EditReward-Bench, outperforming a wide range of VLM-as-judge models."

Reported Metrics

missing

Not extracted

No metric anchors detected.

"Recently, we have witnessed great progress in image editing with natural language instructions."

Rater Population

strong

Domain Experts

Helpful for staffing comparability.

"To address this critical bottleneck, we built EditReward, trained with our new large-scale human preference dataset, meticulously annotated by trained experts following a rigorous protocol containing over 200K preference pairs."

Human Feedback Details

  • Uses human feedback: Yes
  • Feedback types: Pairwise Preference
  • Rater population: Domain Experts
  • Expertise required: General

Evaluation Details

  • Evaluation modes: Llm As Judge
  • Agentic eval: None
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Evidence quality: High
  • Use this page as: Secondary protocol comparison source

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

Genai-BenchAurora-BenchEditreward-Bench

Reported Metrics

No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Recently, we have witnessed great progress in image editing with natural language instructions.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Recently, we have witnessed great progress in image editing with natural language instructions.
  • Several closed-source models like GPT-Image-1, Seedream, and Google-Nano-Banana have shown highly promising progress.
  • However, the open-source models are still lagging.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • To address this critical bottleneck, we built EditReward, trained with our new large-scale human preference dataset, meticulously annotated by trained experts following a rigorous protocol containing over 200K preference pairs.
  • EditReward demonstrates superior alignment with human preferences in instruction-guided image editing tasks.
  • Experiments show that EditReward achieves state-of-the-art human correlation on established benchmarks such as GenAI-Bench, AURORA-Bench, ImagenHub, and our new EditReward-Bench, outperforming a wide range of VLM-as-judge models.

Why It Matters For Eval

  • To address this critical bottleneck, we built EditReward, trained with our new large-scale human preference dataset, meticulously annotated by trained experts following a rigorous protocol containing over 200K preference pairs.
  • EditReward demonstrates superior alignment with human preferences in instruction-guided image editing tasks.

Researcher Checklist

  • Pass: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    Detected: Pairwise Preference

  • Pass: Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Llm As Judge

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Pass: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    Detected: Genai-Bench, Aurora-Bench, Editreward-Bench

  • Gap: Metric reporting is present

    No metric terms extracted.

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.