Skip to content
← Back to explorer

From Days to Minutes: An Autonomous AI Agent Achieves Reliable Clinical Triage in Remote Patient Monitoring

Seunghwan Kim, Tiffany H. Kung, Heena Verma, Dilan Edirisinghe, Kaveh Sedehi, Johanna Alvarez, Diane Shilling, Audra Lisa Doyle, Ajit Chary, William Borden, Ming Jack Po · Mar 10, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

High trust

Use this as a practical starting point for protocol research, then validate against the original paper.

Best use

Primary protocol reference for eval design

What to verify

Validate the exact study setup in the full paper before operational use.

Evidence quality

High

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

Background: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) generates vast data, yet landmark trials (Tele-HF, BEAT-HF) failed because data volume overwhelmed clinical staff. While TIM-HF2 showed 24/7 physician-led monitoring reduces mortality by 30%, this model remains prohibitively expensive and unscalable. Methods: We developed Sentinel, an autonomous AI agent using Model Context Protocol (MCP) for contextual triage of RPM vitals via 21 clinical tools and multi-step reasoning. Evaluation included: (1) self-consistency (100 readings x 5 runs); (2) comparison against rule-based thresholds; and (3) validation against 6 clinicians (3 physicians, 3 NPs) using a connected matrix design. A leave-one-out (LOO) analysis compared the agent against individual clinicians; severe overtriage cases underwent independent physician adjudication. Results: Against a human majority-vote standard (N=467), the agent achieved 95.8% emergency sensitivity and 88.5% sensitivity for all actionable alerts (85.7% specificity). Four-level exact accuracy was 69.4% (quadratic-weighted kappa=0.778); 95.9% of classifications were within one severity level. In LOO analysis, the agent outperformed every clinician in emergency sensitivity (97.5% vs. 60.0% aggregate) and actionable sensitivity (90.9% vs. 69.5%). While disagreements skewed toward overtriage (22.5%), independent adjudication of severe gaps (>=2 levels) validated agent escalation in 88-94% of cases; consensus resolution validated 100%. The agent showed near-perfect self-consistency (kappa=0.850). Median cost was $0.34/triage. Conclusions: Sentinel triages RPM vitals with sensitivity exceeding individual clinicians. By automating systematic context synthesis, Sentinel addresses the core limitation of prior RPM trials, offering a scalable path toward the intensive monitoring shown to reduce mortality while maintaining a clinically defensible overtriage profile.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper has strong direct human-feedback and evaluation protocol signal and is suitable as a primary eval pipeline reference.

Best use

Primary protocol reference for eval design

Use if you need

A concrete protocol example with enough signal to inform rater workflow design.

Main weakness

No major weakness surfaced.

Trust level

High

Usefulness score

75/100 • High

Use this as a primary source when designing or comparing eval protocols.

Human Feedback Signal

Detected

Evaluation Signal

Detected

Usefulness for eval research

High-confidence candidate

Extraction confidence 80%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

strong

Expert Verification

Directly usable for protocol triage.

"Background: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) generates vast data, yet landmark trials (Tele-HF, BEAT-HF) failed because data volume overwhelmed clinical staff."

Evaluation Modes

strong

Automatic Metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"Background: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) generates vast data, yet landmark trials (Tele-HF, BEAT-HF) failed because data volume overwhelmed clinical staff."

Quality Controls

strong

Adjudication

Calibration/adjudication style controls detected.

"A leave-one-out (LOO) analysis compared the agent against individual clinicians; severe overtriage cases underwent independent physician adjudication."

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Background: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) generates vast data, yet landmark trials (Tele-HF, BEAT-HF) failed because data volume overwhelmed clinical staff."

Reported Metrics

strong

Accuracy, Kappa

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"Four-level exact accuracy was 69.4% (quadratic-weighted kappa=0.778); 95.9% of classifications were within one severity level."

Rater Population

strong

Domain Experts

Helpful for staffing comparability.

"Background: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) generates vast data, yet landmark trials (Tele-HF, BEAT-HF) failed because data volume overwhelmed clinical staff."

Human Feedback Details

  • Uses human feedback: Yes
  • Feedback types: Expert Verification
  • Rater population: Domain Experts
  • Expertise required: Medicine

Evaluation Details

  • Evaluation modes: Automatic Metrics
  • Agentic eval: Long Horizon
  • Quality controls: Adjudication
  • Evidence quality: High
  • Use this page as: Primary protocol reference for eval design

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported Metrics

accuracykappa

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Background: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) generates vast data, yet landmark trials (Tele-HF, BEAT-HF) failed because data volume overwhelmed clinical staff.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Background: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) generates vast data, yet landmark trials (Tele-HF, BEAT-HF) failed because data volume overwhelmed clinical staff.
  • While TIM-HF2 showed 24/7 physician-led monitoring reduces mortality by 30%, this model remains prohibitively expensive and unscalable.
  • Methods: We developed Sentinel, an autonomous AI agent using Model Context Protocol (MCP) for contextual triage of RPM vitals via 21 clinical tools and multi-step reasoning.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Automatic metrics, Long-horizon tasks) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • Results: Against a human majority-vote standard (N=467), the agent achieved 95.8% emergency sensitivity and 88.5% sensitivity for all actionable alerts (85.7% specificity).
  • In LOO analysis, the agent outperformed every clinician in emergency sensitivity (97.5% vs.
  • While disagreements skewed toward overtriage (22.5%), independent adjudication of severe gaps (>=2 levels) validated agent escalation in 88-94% of cases; consensus resolution validated 100%.

Why It Matters For Eval

  • Results: Against a human majority-vote standard (N=467), the agent achieved 95.8% emergency sensitivity and 88.5% sensitivity for all actionable alerts (85.7% specificity).
  • In LOO analysis, the agent outperformed every clinician in emergency sensitivity (97.5% vs.

Researcher Checklist

  • Pass: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    Detected: Expert Verification

  • Pass: Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Automatic Metrics

  • Pass: Quality control reporting appears

    Detected: Adjudication

  • Gap: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Pass: Metric reporting is present

    Detected: accuracy, kappa

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.