Mitigating Distribution Sharpening in Math RLVR via Distribution-Aligned Hint Synthesis and Backward Hint Annealing

Pei-Xi Xie, Che-Yu Lin, Cheng-Lin Yang · Apr 9, 2026 · Citations: 0

Open arXiv Find Implementation RSS feed Shortlist (0)

How to use this paper page

Coverage: Recent

Use this page to decide whether the paper is strong enough to influence an eval design. It summarizes the abstract plus available structured metadata. If the signal is thin, use it as background context and compare it against stronger hub pages before making protocol choices.

Best use

Background context only

Metadata: Recent

Trust level

Provisional

Signals: Recent

What still needs checking

Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

Signal confidence unavailable

Abstract

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) can improve low-$k$ reasoning accuracy while narrowing solution coverage on challenging math questions, and pass@1 gains do not necessarily translate into better large-$k$ performance. Existing hint-based approaches can make challenging questions trainable, but they leave two issues underexplored: teacher-student distribution mismatch and the need to reduce hint exposure to match no-hint evaluation. We address these issues through two components. Distribution-Aligned Hint Synthesis (DAHS) constructs verified teacher hints conditioned on student-style responses. Backward Hint Annealing (BHA) anneals hint exposure across difficulty buckets and uses per-question hint dropout to preserve no-hint updates throughout RL training. We evaluate the method in math RLVR under the DAPO training framework across AIME24, AIME25, and AIME26 using $\texttt{Qwen3-1.7B-Base}$ and $\texttt{Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct}$. On $\texttt{Qwen3-1.7B-Base}$, our method improves both pass@1 and pass@2048 relative to DAPO across the three AIME benchmarks. On $\texttt{Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct}$, the gains are concentrated in the large-$k$ regime. These results suggest that, in math RLVR, hint scaffolding is effective when it restores learnable updates on challenging questions early in training and is then gradually removed before no-hint evaluation.

Use caution before copying this protocol

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub

HFEPX Relevance Assessment

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

Trust level

Provisional

Eval-Fit Score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

HFEPX Fit

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence: Provisional

If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here:

Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub Tool-Use Eval Hub

What This Page Found In The Paper

Each field below shows whether the signal looked explicit, partial, or missing in the available metadata. Use this to judge what is safe to trust directly and what still needs full-paper validation.