Only relative ranks matter in weight-clustered large language models
Borja Aizpurua, Sukhbinder Singh, Román Orús · Mar 18, 2026 · Citations: 0
How to use this page
Low trustUse this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.
Best use
Background context only
What to verify
Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.
Evidence quality
Low
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) contain billions of parameters, yet many exact values are not essential. We show that what matters most is the relative rank of weights-whether one connection is stronger or weaker than another-rather than precise magnitudes. To reduce the number of unique weight values, we apply weight clustering to pretrained models, replacing every weight matrix with K shared values from K-means. For Llama 3.1-8B-Instruct and SmolLM2-135M, reducing each matrix to only 16-64 distinct values preserves strong accuracy without retraining, providing a simple, training-free method to compress LLMs on disk. Optionally fine-tuning only the cluster means (centroids) recovers 30-40 percent of the remaining accuracy gap at minimal cost. We then systematically randomize cluster means while keeping assignments fixed. Scrambling the relative ranks of the clusters degrades quality sharply-perplexity can increase by orders of magnitude-even when global statistics such as mean and variance are preserved. In contrast, rank-preserving randomizations cause almost no loss at mid and late layers. On the other hand, when many layers are perturbed simultaneously, progressive layer-by-layer replacement reveals that scale drift-not rank distortion-is the dominant collapse mechanism; however, an affine correction w' = aw + b with a > 0 (which preserves both rank order and overall weight distribution) can substantially delay this drift. This rank-based perspective offers a new lens on model compression and robustness.