HFEPX · Eval paper review

SimRec: Learning to Search, Ask, and Recommend from Simulated Interaction

Yaxin Zhang, Xingyu Wu, Yuchen Yan, Yuqin Dai +5 more

Published

Nov 11, 2026

Citations

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

27/100 (Low)

Extraction confidence

45% (Low)

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Rater population

Not reported

Signals refreshed

Nov 11, 2026

Open arXiv Find implementation Shortlist (0) RSS feed

Should you rely on this paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Low-signal caution for protocol decisions

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.
The abstract does not clearly name benchmarks or metrics.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Main weakness

The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.

Human feedback signal

Not explicit

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation signal

Detected

Eval setup described

Usefulness for eval research

27/100

Adjacent candidate

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here

Human Eval Papers LLM-as-Judge Papers Pairwise Preference Papers Tool-Use Evaluation Search

Abstract

LLM-based recommendation agents can search catalogs, inspect products, ask users, and revise rejected recommendations. However, these behaviors are often governed by hand-designed workflows, while existing training methods optimize isolated components such as query rewriting or list ranking rather than the interaction policy as a whole. We present SimRec, a reinforcement learning framework that trains the full interaction policy of a tool-integrated recommendation agent. SimRec introduces two components. A task-anchored user simulator provides feedback on every recommendation: conditioned on the current task need rather than on user profile, and it can be an external LLM or the recommender itself under self-play. A task-aligned reward optimizes the whole trajectory with GRPO, crediting natural retrieval quality and valid tool use alongside the final hit, with training-only target injection to handle sparse hits over large catalogs. On ESCI and Amazon C4, SimRec improves the NDCG@100 of a Qwen3-4B agent from 32.23% to 35.42% and from 22.94% to 24.72%}, outperforming training-free agents on far larger backbones and task-aligned baselines on NDCG. Analysis shows that the trained agent verifies candidates, uses preferences, and recovers from rejected recommendations far more often than its untrained counterpart. Our code is available at https://github.com/ZJU-REAL/SimRec .

What we could verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.