Human Feedback Types
missingNone explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Humans can learn rapidly from limited experience, while neural networks typically require extensive training."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Abigail L. Tenenbaum, R. Thomas McCoy
Published
Nov 12, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Low
Usefulness score
0/100 (Low)
Extraction confidence
15% (Low)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Nov 12, 2026
This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.
Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.
All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.
What to verify
Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.
Main weakness
This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Humans can learn rapidly from limited experience, while neural networks typically require extensive training. In this work, we investigate what properties of a neural network can enable it to learn rapidly. We study neural networks that have been optimized via meta-learning, a technique that exposes a network to many related functions to facilitate its subsequent learning of similar functions. Prior work has shown that these meta-learned networks can learn new functions rapidly, but how they do so remains unclear. To investigate their internal structure, we take inspiration from classic work demonstrating additive relationships among the learned vectors that neural networks use to represent words (e.g., "king" minus "man" plus "woman" approximates "queen"). Analogously, we look for additive relationships among a meta-learned network's "representations" of different functions; when a meta-learned network rapidly learns to implement a specific function, all of its adapted parameter values can be concatenated into a single vector that we treat as representing the function. We find that such parameter vectors can be added and subtracted according to symbolic relationships among the functions they represent, yielding new parameter vectors that successfully represent the functions predicted by the corresponding symbolic manipulations: the networks specified by these artificially recombined vectors actually implement the intended functions without any direct training on them. Our results suggest that meta-learning can tune a network's starting point to organize subsequent learning along systematic, functionally meaningful trajectories through the space of possible parameter vectors, providing a geometric basis for realizing inductive biases in neural networks.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Humans can learn rapidly from limited experience, while neural networks typically require extensive training."
None explicit
Validate eval design from full paper text.
"Humans can learn rapidly from limited experience, while neural networks typically require extensive training."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Humans can learn rapidly from limited experience, while neural networks typically require extensive training."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"Humans can learn rapidly from limited experience, while neural networks typically require extensive training."
Not extracted
No metric anchors detected.
"Humans can learn rapidly from limited experience, while neural networks typically require extensive training."
No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.
No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.
Humans can learn rapidly from limited experience, while neural networks typically require extensive training.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
No explicit human feedback protocol detected.
Evaluation mode is explicit
No clear evaluation mode extracted.
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.
Metric reporting is present
No metric terms extracted.