Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Code Broker: A Multi-Agent System for Automated Code Quality Assessment

Samer Attrah · Apr 25, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Low trust

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Low

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

We present Code Broker, a multi agent system built on Google s Agent Development Kit ADK that analyses Python source code from individual files, local directory trees, or remote GitHub repositories and generates structured, actionable quality assessment reports. The system realises a hierarchical five agent architecture in which a root orchestrator coordinates a sequential pipeline agent that, in turn, dispatches three specialised agents concurrently a Correctness Assessor, a Style Assessor, and a Description Generator before synthesising their findings through an Improvement Recommender. Reports quantify four quality dimensions correctness, security, style, and maintainability on a normalised scale and are rendered in both Markdown and HTML for integration into diverse developer workflows. Code Broker fuses LLM based semantic reasoning with deterministic static analysis signals from Pylint, employs asynchronous execution with exponential backoff retry logic to improve robustness under transient API failures, and explores lightweight session memory for retaining and querying prior assessment context across runs. We frame this paper as a technical report on system design, prompt engineering, and tool orchestration, and present a preliminary qualitative evaluation on representative Python codebases of varying scale. The results indicate that parallel specialised agents produce readable, developer oriented feedback that complements traditional linting, while also foregrounding current limitations in evaluation depth, security tooling, large repository handling, and the exclusive reliance on in memory persistence. All code and reproducibility materials are publicly available: https://github.com/Samir-atra/agents_intensive_dev.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

  • This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
  • The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.
  • The abstract does not clearly name benchmarks or metrics.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

Main weakness

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

0/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Detected

Usefulness for eval research

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence 15%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

missing

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"We present Code Broker, a multi agent system built on Google s Agent Development Kit ADK that analyses Python source code from individual files, local directory trees, or remote GitHub repositories and generates structured, actionable quality assessment reports."

Evaluation Modes

missing

None explicit

Validate eval design from full paper text.

"We present Code Broker, a multi agent system built on Google s Agent Development Kit ADK that analyses Python source code from individual files, local directory trees, or remote GitHub repositories and generates structured, actionable quality assessment reports."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"We present Code Broker, a multi agent system built on Google s Agent Development Kit ADK that analyses Python source code from individual files, local directory trees, or remote GitHub repositories and generates structured, actionable quality assessment reports."

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"We present Code Broker, a multi agent system built on Google s Agent Development Kit ADK that analyses Python source code from individual files, local directory trees, or remote GitHub repositories and generates structured, actionable quality assessment reports."

Reported Metrics

missing

Not extracted

No metric anchors detected.

"We present Code Broker, a multi agent system built on Google s Agent Development Kit ADK that analyses Python source code from individual files, local directory trees, or remote GitHub repositories and generates structured, actionable quality assessment reports."

Human Feedback Details

  • Uses human feedback: No
  • Feedback types: None
  • Rater population: Not reported
  • Expertise required: Coding

Evaluation Details

  • Evaluation modes:
  • Agentic eval: Multi Agent
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Evidence quality: Low
  • Use this page as: Background context only

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported Metrics

No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.

Research Brief

Metadata summary

We present Code Broker, a multi agent system built on Google s Agent Development Kit ADK that analyses Python source code from individual files, local directory trees, or remote GitHub repositories and generates structured, actionable quality assessment reports.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • We present Code Broker, a multi agent system built on Google s Agent Development Kit ADK that analyses Python source code from individual files, local directory trees, or remote GitHub repositories and generates structured, actionable quality assessment reports.
  • The system realises a hierarchical five agent architecture in which a root orchestrator coordinates a sequential pipeline agent that, in turn, dispatches three specialised agents concurrently a Correctness Assessor, a Style Assessor, and a Description Generator before synthesising their findings through an Improvement Recommender.
  • Reports quantify four quality dimensions correctness, security, style, and maintainability on a normalised scale and are rendered in both Markdown and HTML for integration into diverse developer workflows.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Tool-use evaluation) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • We present Code Broker, a multi agent system built on Google s Agent Development Kit ADK that analyses Python source code from individual files, local directory trees, or remote GitHub repositories and generates structured, actionable…
  • The system realises a hierarchical five agent architecture in which a root orchestrator coordinates a sequential pipeline agent that, in turn, dispatches three specialised agents concurrently a Correctness Assessor, a Style Assessor, and a…
  • We frame this paper as a technical report on system design, prompt engineering, and tool orchestration, and present a preliminary qualitative evaluation on representative Python codebases of varying scale.

Why It Matters For Eval

  • We present Code Broker, a multi agent system built on Google s Agent Development Kit ADK that analyses Python source code from individual files, local directory trees, or remote GitHub repositories and generates structured, actionable…
  • The system realises a hierarchical five agent architecture in which a root orchestrator coordinates a sequential pipeline agent that, in turn, dispatches three specialised agents concurrently a Correctness Assessor, a Style Assessor, and a…

Researcher Checklist

  • Gap: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    No explicit human feedback protocol detected.

  • Gap: Evaluation mode is explicit

    No clear evaluation mode extracted.

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Gap: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Gap: Metric reporting is present

    No metric terms extracted.

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.