Human Feedback Types
missingNone explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Parameter-efficient fine-tuning is often assumed to preserve pretrained capabilities because it updates only a small number of parameters."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Estelle Zheng, Sébastien Warichet, Emmanuel Helbert, Christophe Cerisara
Published
Aug 26, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Low
Usefulness score
0/100 (Low)
Extraction confidence
35% (Low)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Aug 26, 2026
This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.
Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.
All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.
What to verify
Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.
Main weakness
This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Parameter-efficient fine-tuning is often assumed to preserve pretrained capabilities because it updates only a small number of parameters. We show that this assumption depends strongly on adapter capacity. We study factual acquisition in a controlled OpenStreetMap-derived benchmark where Qwen3-4B must acquire anonymized geographic associations while retaining unrelated capabilities. Comparing full fine-tuning (FFT) with quantized low-rank adaptation (QLoRA) at ranks 8, 16, 32, and 64, we find that rank induces a clear acquisition--retention frontier. Low-rank QLoRA preserves out-of-domain (OOD) performance but acquires fewer facts, whereas higher ranks improve same-fact paraphrase generalization at an increasing cost in performance on unrelated benchmarks. FFT behaves as a conservative baseline: it retains general capabilities well, but does not reach the highest factual-acquisition regime. Distributional, weight-space, and spectral diagnostics mirror this behavioral trade-off, with higher-rank QLoRA moving farther from the pretrained model. A separate math adaptation experiment shows a weaker frontier, suggesting that the effect is most pronounced when adaptation must install new factual associations rather than reinforce skills already supported by pretraining. Code and data are available at https://github.com/zhngstl/new_facts_forgetting.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Parameter-efficient fine-tuning is often assumed to preserve pretrained capabilities because it updates only a small number of parameters."
Automatic Metrics
Includes extracted eval setup.
"Parameter-efficient fine-tuning is often assumed to preserve pretrained capabilities because it updates only a small number of parameters."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Parameter-efficient fine-tuning is often assumed to preserve pretrained capabilities because it updates only a small number of parameters."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"Parameter-efficient fine-tuning is often assumed to preserve pretrained capabilities because it updates only a small number of parameters."
Not extracted
No metric anchors detected.
"Parameter-efficient fine-tuning is often assumed to preserve pretrained capabilities because it updates only a small number of parameters."
No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.
No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.
Parameter-efficient fine-tuning is often assumed to preserve pretrained capabilities because it updates only a small number of parameters.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
No explicit human feedback protocol detected.
Evaluation mode is explicit
Detected: Automatic Metrics
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.
Metric reporting is present
No metric terms extracted.