Skip to content
← Back to explorer

DMax: Aggressive Parallel Decoding for dLLMs

Zigeng Chen, Gongfan Fang, Xinyin Ma, Ruonan Yu, Xinchao Wang · Apr 9, 2026 · Citations: 0

Data freshness

Extraction: Recent

Check recency before relying on this page for active eval decisions. Use stale pages as context and verify against current hub results.

Metadata refreshed

Apr 9, 2026, 2:35 PM

Recent

Extraction refreshed

Apr 9, 2026, 2:35 PM

Recent

Extraction source

Persisted extraction

Confidence unavailable

Abstract

We present DMax, a new paradigm for efficient diffusion language models (dLLMs). It mitigates error accumulation in parallel decoding, enabling aggressive decoding parallelism while preserving generation quality. Unlike conventional masked dLLMs that decode through a binary mask-to-token transition, DMax reformulates decoding as a progressive self-refinement from mask embeddings to token embeddings. At the core of our approach is On-Policy Uniform Training, a novel training strategy that efficiently unifies masked and uniform dLLMs, equipping the model to recover clean tokens from both masked inputs and its own erroneous predictions. Building on this foundation, we further propose Soft Parallel Decoding. We represent each intermediate decoding state as an interpolation between the predicted token embedding and the mask embedding, enabling iterative self-revising in embedding space. Extensive experiments across a variety of benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of DMax. Compared with the original LLaDA-2.0-mini, our method improves TPF on GSM8K from 2.04 to 5.47 while preserving accuracy. On MBPP, it increases TPF from 2.71 to 5.86 while maintaining comparable performance. On two H200 GPUs, our model achieves an average of 1,338 TPS at batch size 1. Code is available at: https://github.com/czg1225/DMax

Low-signal caution for protocol decisions

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

HFEPX Relevance Assessment

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

Trust level

Provisional

Eval-Fit Score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

HFEPX Fit

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence: Provisional

Field Provenance & Confidence

Each key protocol field shows extraction state, confidence band, and data source so you can decide whether to trust it directly or validate from full text.

Human Feedback Types

provisional

None explicit

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

Evidence snippet: We present DMax, a new paradigm for efficient diffusion language models (dLLMs).

Evaluation Modes

provisional

Automatic metrics

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Includes extracted eval setup.

Evidence snippet: We present DMax, a new paradigm for efficient diffusion language models (dLLMs).

Quality Controls

provisional

Not reported

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No explicit QC controls found.

Evidence snippet: We present DMax, a new paradigm for efficient diffusion language models (dLLMs).

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional

GSM8K

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Useful for quick benchmark comparison.

Evidence snippet: Compared with the original LLaDA-2.0-mini, our method improves TPF on GSM8K from 2.04 to 5.47 while preserving accuracy.

Reported Metrics

provisional

Accuracy

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

Evidence snippet: Compared with the original LLaDA-2.0-mini, our method improves TPF on GSM8K from 2.04 to 5.47 while preserving accuracy.

Rater Population

provisional

Unknown

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Rater source not explicitly reported.

Evidence snippet: We present DMax, a new paradigm for efficient diffusion language models (dLLMs).

Human Data Lens

Structured extraction is still processing. Below are provisional signals inferred from abstract text only.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: GSM8K
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Lens

Evaluation fields are currently inferred heuristically from abstract text.

  • Potential evaluation modes: Automatic metrics
  • Potential metric signals: Accuracy
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Deterministic synthesis

We present DMax, a new paradigm for efficient diffusion language models (dLLMs).

Generated Apr 9, 2026, 2:35 PM · Grounded in abstract + metadata only

Key Takeaways

  • We present DMax, a new paradigm for efficient diffusion language models (dLLMs).
  • It mitigates error accumulation in parallel decoding, enabling aggressive decoding parallelism while preserving generation quality.
  • Unlike conventional masked dLLMs that decode through a binary mask-to-token transition, DMax reformulates decoding as a progressive self-refinement from mask embeddings to token embeddings.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against others mentioning GSM8K.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Automatic metrics) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.