Human Feedback Types
provisional (inferred)None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Large reasoning models (LRMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in tackling complex tasks through step-by-step thinking."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Heming Xia, Cunxiao Du, Rui Li, Chak Tou Leong +2 more
Published
Oct 12, 2025
Citations
0
Trust level
Provisional
Usefulness score
Unavailable
Extraction confidence
0% (Provisional)
Derived from abstract and metadata only.
Signals refreshed
May 17, 2026
Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.
This page is a lightweight research summary built from the abstract and metadata while deeper extraction catches up.
All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.
What to verify
Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.
Main weakness
This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.
Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Large reasoning models (LRMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in tackling complex tasks through step-by-step thinking. However, this lengthy reasoning process incurs substantial computational and latency overheads, hindering the practical deployment of LRMs. This work presents a new approach to mitigating overthinking in LRMs via black-box persuasive prompting. By treating LRMs as black-box communicators, we investigate how to persuade them to generate concise responses without compromising accuracy. We introduce Whisper, an iterative refinement framework that generates high-quality persuasive prompts from diverse perspectives. Experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that Whisper consistently reduces token usage while preserving performance. Notably, Whisper achieves a 3x reduction in average response length on simple GSM8K questions for the Qwen3 model series and delivers an average ~40% token reduction across all benchmarks. For closed-source APIs, Whisper reduces token usage on MATH-500 by 46% for Claude-3.7 and 50% for Gemini-2.5. Further analysis reveals the broad applicability of Whisper across data domains, model scales, and families, underscoring the potential of black-box persuasive prompting as a practical strategy for enhancing LRM efficiency.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Large reasoning models (LRMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in tackling complex tasks through step-by-step thinking."
Automatic metrics
Includes extracted eval setup.
"Large reasoning models (LRMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in tackling complex tasks through step-by-step thinking."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Large reasoning models (LRMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in tackling complex tasks through step-by-step thinking."
GSM8K
Useful for quick benchmark comparison.
"Notably, Whisper achieves a 3x reduction in average response length on simple GSM8K questions for the Qwen3 model series and delivers an average ~40% token reduction across all benchmarks."
Accuracy
Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.
"By treating LRMs as black-box communicators, we investigate how to persuade them to generate concise responses without compromising accuracy."
Unknown
Rater source not explicitly reported.
"Large reasoning models (LRMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in tackling complex tasks through step-by-step thinking."
This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.
Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.
Large reasoning models (LRMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in tackling complex tasks through step-by-step thinking.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.