UrbanGround: From Local Perception to Spatial Agency in a Real-Scale City
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-core · Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can interpret a street view, but urban agency depends on whether such local evidence remains useful after the agent starts to move. In this paper, we investigate how far current MLLM agents can turn local urban perception into reliable action in a complicated real-scale city. We propose UrbanGround, the first sandbox to make this question testable in a physically constrained replica of Hong Kong built from territory-wide 3D geospatial data. UrbanGround supports closed-loop interaction from a first-person view and provides an interactive map for navigation. Agents can directly enter the 3D city and explore from a first-person view. Our analysis follows the growth of the spatial problem through three research questions. We first test whether an agent can ground a local scene well enough to answer spatial questions after active observation. Then we ask whether that grounding supports navigation as destinations become farther away and less explicit. Finally, we examine whether the resulting behavior survives changes in route availability and pedestrian motion. Contemporary MLLM agents usually show useful atomic abilities in visual recognition and short-range spatial reasoning, while orientation and pedestrian-aware movement remain unreliable. Their central failure emerges over extended exploration, where local abilities do not compose into sustained goal-directed behavior and errors accumulate without effective correction. We hope UrbanGround will support broader study of how far current MLLM agents can explore reliably in complex, open-ended urban environments.
Results and benchmarks
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can interpret a street view, but urban agency depends on whether such local evidence remains useful after the agent starts to move.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Question answering | GPT-5.6-Luna | Local QA Accuracy | 63.2 | paper-derived |
| Question answering | 60.9 | Local QA Accuracy | 62.3 | paper-derived |
| Agentic tool use | GPT-5.5 (observed) | Mean remaining ratio . | 98.9 | paper-derived |
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Compare implementation paths
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
- Maintenance
- Recently updated
- Confidence
- Medium
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 125
- Last push
- Sep 2, 2026 (57d)
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords
- No CI pipeline detected
- No Docker setup
- Maintenance
- Recently updated
- Confidence
- Low
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 1
- Last push
- Sep 15, 2026 (45d)
Matched via arXiv identifier search
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
- Dependency manifest missing
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Repositories and ecosystem
Official
No additional official repositories detected.
Community
- UrbanGround/UrbanGroundConfidence: Medium
UrbanGround: From Local Perception to Spatial Agency in a Real-Scale City
125 stars · 7 forks · Last push Sep 2, 2026 · MIT license
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
- oneRede/ai_physical_research
Confidence: Low · 1 stars
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Datasets
Spaces
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Tasks
Agentic tool use
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Natural Language Processing, AI Agents, Geospatial AI
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.