Sim-to-reality adaptation for Deep Reinforcement Learning applied to an underwater docking application
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) offers a robust alternative to traditional control methods for autonomous underwater docking, particularly in adapting to unpredictable environmental conditions. However, bridging the "sim-to-real" gap and managing high training latencies remain significant bottlenecks for practical deployment. This paper presents a systematic approach for autonomous docking using the Girona Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) by leveraging a high-fidelity digital twin environment. We adapted the Stonefish simulator into a multiprocessing RL framework to significantly accelerate the learning process while incorporating realistic AUV dynamics, collision models, and sensor noise. Using the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm, we developed a 6-DoF control policy trained in a headless environment with randomized starting positions to ensure generalized performance. Our reward structure accounts for distance, orientation, action smoothness, and adaptive collision penalties to facilitate soft docking. Experimental results demonstrate that the agent achieved a success rate of over 90% in simulation. Furthermore, successful validation in a physical test tank confirmed the efficacy of the sim-to-reality adaptation, with the DRL controller exhibiting emergent behaviors such as pitch-based braking and yaw oscillations to assist in mechanical alignment.
Results and benchmarks
Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) offers a robust alternative to traditional control methods for autonomous underwater docking, particularly in adapting to unpredictable environmental conditions.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Start from this likely method family: Reinforcement learning.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Repositories and ecosystem
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
- eerstar/LLM-Agent-paper-daily
Confidence: Low · 0 stars
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Tasks
Agentic tool use, Scientific computing
Methods
Reinforcement learning
Domains
AI Agents
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.