Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
2 risk flags
none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: hot
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Agentic tool use
ChatGPT (gpt-3.5-turbo-0613)
Format ACC
96.16
Source: paper fulltext
Agentic tool use
78.74
Format ACC
68.63
Source: paper fulltext
Agentic tool use
GPT4 (gpt-4-0613)
Format ACC
97.12
Source: paper fulltext
Agentic tool use
81.65
Format ACC
80.52
Source: paper fulltext
Agentic tool use
89.27
Format ACC
72.37
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

5 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Agentic tool use ChatGPT (gpt-3.5-turbo-0613) Format ACC 96.16 paper-derived No explicit refs
Agentic tool use 78.74 Format ACC 68.63 paper-derived No explicit refs
Agentic tool use GPT4 (gpt-4-0613) Format ACC 97.12 paper-derived No explicit refs
Agentic tool use 81.65 Format ACC 80.52 paper-derived No explicit refs
Agentic tool use 89.27 Format ACC 72.37 paper-derived No explicit refs

Seal-Tools: Self-Instruct Tool Learning Dataset for Agent Tuning and Detailed Benchmark focuses on agentic tool use.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

fairyshine/seal-tools is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (Apache-2.0).

Open fairyshine/seal-tools

Reproduction Risks

  • No CI workflows detected
  • Dependency manifest is missing

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 85/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

fairyshine/seal-tools
best maintained
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
54
Last push
Nov 5, 2024 (544d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
MadeAgents/Hammer
alternative
Maintenance: Stale risk
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Community adoption signal (115 stars)

Stars
115
Last push
Jun 13, 2025 (324d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
fairyshine/Seal-Tools
alternative
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
54
Last push
Nov 5, 2024 (544d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

fairyshine/seal-tools
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

The source code and dataset mentioned in the paper Seal-Tools: Self-Instruct Tool Learning Dataset for Agent Tuning and Detailed Benchmark.

Stars: 54
Forks: 5
Last push: Nov 5, 2024
License: Apache-2.0
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (54 stars)
License ✓
CI –
Deps –
Docker –
  • Selected fairyshine/seal-tools as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: May 2, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · fairyshine/seal-tools has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 544 days ago.
Open fairyshine/seal-tools

Additional implementations

Official

No additional official repositories detected.

Community

  • fairyshine/Seal-Tools
    Confidence: Medium

    The source code and dataset mentioned in the paper Seal-Tools: Self-Instruct Tool Learning Dataset for Agent Tuning and Detailed Benchmark.

    Stars: 54
    Last push: Nov 5, 2024
    License: Apache-2.0

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy model matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

Broaden dataset search

Agentic systems Agentic tool use dataset Agentic systems AI Agents dataset Agentic tool use dataset

Spaces

No trustworthy demo spaces right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face
Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Research context

Tasks

Agentic tool use

Methods

Agentic systems

Domains

AI Agents

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Agentic tool use Agentic systems AI Agents

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.

Post a Job Get a Quote