Matched via arXiv identifier search
- Stars
- 0
- Last push
- Jun 15, 2026 (5d ago)
Risk flags
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
- Low confidence match
Xiaoying Zhang, Zichen Liu, Yipeng Zhang, Xia Hu, Wenqi Shao
Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
Standard reinforcement learning (RL) for large language model (LLM) agents typically optimizes extrinsic rewards, prioritizing isolated task completion over continual adaptation. Consequently, agents often converge to suboptimal policies due to limited exploration. Furthermore, accumulated experience remains implicitly trapped within model parameters, hindering its explicit reuse for guiding future decisions. Inspire ...
d by human retrospective self-improvement, we introduce RetroAgent, an online RL framework that trains agents to master complex interactive environments not only by solving tasks, but by evolving under the joint guidance of extrinsic task rewards and retrospective dual intrinsic feedback. Specifically, RetroAgent employs a hindsight self-reflection mechanism that generates two complementary signals: (1) intrinsic numerical feedback, which rewards promising exploration by tracking real-time incremental subtask progress relative to prior attempts; and (2) intrinsic language feedback, which enables explicit experience reuse by distilling reusable lessons into a memory buffer for subsequent decision-making. To effectively leverage these textual experiences, we propose Similarity & Utility-Aware Upper Confidence Bound (SimUtil-UCB), a retrieval strategy that balances relevance, historical utility, and exploration. Extensive experiments across four challenging agentic tasks show that RetroAgent achieves new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance. Notably, it surpasses Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) baselines by +18.3% on ALFWorld, +15.4% on WebShop, +27.1% on Sokoban, and +8.9% on MineSweeper, while exhibiting strong test-time adaptation and out-of-distribution generalization.
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
Standard reinforcement learning (RL) for large language model (LLM) agents typically optimizes extrinsic rewards, prioritizing isolated task completion over continual adaptation.
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Risk flags
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
Hardware requirements
No verified implementation available
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
No additional official repositories detected.
RETROAGENT: From Solving to Evolving via Retrospective Dual Intrinsic Feedback
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
Agentic tool use, Retrieval / indexing, Scientific computing
Methods
Reinforcement learning
Domains
Natural Language Processing, Large Language Models, AI Agents, Information Retrieval
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.