ResearchStudio-Reel: Automate the Last Mile of Research from Paper to Poster, Video, and Blog
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Research dissemination, turning a paper into a poster, a talk video, and a blog post, is still a manual last mile. Prior automation treats each artifact in isolation that each re-extract the paper from scratch, usually ship one-way renders the author cannot reopen in PowerPoint or Word, and gates quality on soft VLM-preference scores that plateau while load-bearing sections still read as empty. We argue this last mile is best built as a composition of skills: thin agent-readable contracts that share one upstream extractor and wrap deterministic primitives in a measured-fill loop whose exits are hard pass/fail render gates. We instantiate this as ResearchStudio-Reel, five Claude Code and Codex skills organized into one shared extractor (Paper2Assets), three editable generators (Paper2Poster, Paper2Video, Paper2Blog), and one interactive convergence layer (Paper2Reel). Paper2Assets extracts each paper once into a shared bundle that can be reused by every downstream skill; The three generators produce a print-ready poster, a synchronized talk video, and a bilingual blog that stay factually consistent and round-trip through PowerPoint or Word; Paper2Reel then binds all three into a self-contained HTML viewer whose section-level clicks jump the video, slides, captions, and blog to matching content. On the Paper2Poster benchmark, our posters lead every aesthetic and information sub-criterion against both prior automated systems and single-shot frontier LLMs, surpassing the authors' own on aesthetics under two held-out VLM judges and winning overall on 84% to 93% of papers; capability audits further show that, by uniquely pairing narration-aligned on-slide highlights with a bilingual blog gated by layout-aware DOCX repair, ResearchStudio-Reel is the only pipeline to ship all three editable artifacts. Project is available at https://aka.ms/ResearchStudio
Results and benchmarks
Research dissemination, turning a paper into a poster, a talk video, and a blog post, is still a manual last mile.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.
Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 85/100, status medium.
Implementation
Best maintained implementation now
ResearchStudio: Our AI co-author, from research problem to final publication.
2,442 stars · 139 forks · Last push Aug 20, 2026 · MIT license
- License
- CI
- Dependencies
- Docker
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Partial overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (2442 stars)
microsoft/ResearchStudio is the best available implementation candidate based on ranking signals, but recommendation confidence is not yet high. License is declared (MIT).
Open microsoft/ResearchStudio- No CI workflows detected
- Dependency manifest is missing
- Selected microsoft/ResearchStudio as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
- Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
Compare implementation paths
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
- Maintenance
- Active
- Confidence
- Medium
- Reproducibility
- Limited
- Stars
- 2,442
- Last push
- Aug 20, 2026 (5d)
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Partial overlap with paper title keywords
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
- Maintenance
- Active
- Confidence
- Low
- Reproducibility
- Strong
- Stars
- 1
- Last push
- Jul 29, 2026 (26d)
Matched via arXiv identifier search
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
- Low confidence match
- Maintenance
- Recently updated
- Confidence
- Low
- Reproducibility
- Strong
- Stars
- 0
- Last push
- Jul 20, 2026 (36d)
Matched via arXiv identifier search
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
- Low confidence match
Reproduction readiness
Major work
No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required
- microsoft/ResearchStudio has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
- You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Repositories and ecosystem
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
- Funnyhust/ppt_maker
Confidence: Low · 1 stars
- dohuuduy/ppt-master.
Confidence: Low · 0 stars
- HHH-rgn/ppt
Confidence: Low · 0 stars
- lang759/1122
Confidence: Low · 0 stars
- szy-peter/my-ppt-master
Confidence: Low · 0 stars
- kbhavesh-emory/ResearchStudio
Confidence: Low · 0 stars
Hugging Face artifacts
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
Models
- IDEA-Research/grounding-dino-base
1,417,593 downloads · 202 likes
- IDEA-Research/grounding-dino-tiny
1,094,537 downloads · 111 likes
- ibm-research/PowerMoE-3b
1,376,758 downloads · 22 likes
Broaden model search
Datasets
- Qualcomm-AI-Research/QIVD
3,019 downloads · 1 likes · Updated Jul 22, 2026
Spaces
No trustworthy spaces matches right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceResearch context
Tasks
Agentic tool use
Methods
Agentic systems
Domains
Computer vision, AI Agents
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.