Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: hot
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Agentic tool use
Human
Belief
98.9
Source: paper fulltext
Agentic tool use
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Belief
53.9
Source: paper fulltext
Agentic tool use
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Belief
78.9
Source: paper fulltext
Agentic tool use
Llava 1.6 34B
Belief Inference
93.6
Source: paper fulltext
Agentic tool use
Llava 1.6 34B CoT
Belief Inference
93.2
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

6 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Agentic tool use Human Belief 98.9 paper-derived No explicit refs
Agentic tool use Gemini 1.5 Flash Belief 53.9 paper-derived No explicit refs
Agentic tool use Gemini 1.5 Pro Belief 78.9 paper-derived No explicit refs
Agentic tool use Llava 1.6 34B Belief Inference 93.6 paper-derived No explicit refs
Agentic tool use Llava 1.6 34B CoT Belief Inference 93.2 paper-derived No explicit refs
Agentic tool use Llava 1.6 13B Belief Inference 70.2 paper-derived No explicit refs

MuMA-ToM: Multi-modal Multi-Agent Theory of Mind focuses on agentic tool use.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: low

chuanyangjin/MMToM-QA is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Partial overlap with paper title keywords). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 159 GitHub stars.

Open scai-jhu/muma-tom

Reproduction Risks

  • Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
  • Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
  • Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 80/100, grounding 85/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 2 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

scai-jhu/muma-tom
historical official
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
40
Last push
Jan 23, 2025 (448d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
SCAI-JHU/MuMA-ToM
alternative
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
40
Last push
Jan 23, 2025 (448d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

Only a historical official implementation is available.

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

scai-jhu/muma-tom
Historical official
Stars: 40
Last push: Jan 23, 2025
  • Only historical official repository was found: scai-jhu/muma-tom.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Apr 15, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · scai-jhu/muma-tom has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 448 days ago.
Open scai-jhu/muma-tom

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

Additional implementations

Official

No additional official repositories detected.

Community

  • SCAI-JHU/MuMA-ToM
    Confidence: Medium

    [AAAI 2025 𝐎𝐫𝐚𝐥] MuMA-ToM: Multi-modal Multi-Agent Theory of Mind

    Stars: 40
    Last push: Jan 23, 2025

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy model matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

Broaden dataset search

Agentic systems Agentic tool use dataset Agentic systems AI Agents dataset Agentic tool use dataset

Spaces

No trustworthy demo spaces right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face
Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Research context

Tasks

Agentic tool use

Methods

Agentic systems

Domains

AI Agents

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Agentic tool use Agentic systems AI Agents

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.

Post a Job Get a Quote