Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

MNIST-PRO: MNIST is Back as a Partially Observable World for AI Agents

Vernon Toh, Navonil Majumder, Zhengyuan Liu, Nancy F. Chen, Soujanya PoriaPublished Aug 31, 2026
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

AI agents in partially observable environments need to coordinate active sensing with working memory to maintain an evolving perceptual state. However, existing benchmarks struggle to isolate this perceptual-state construction and interpretation capability because they introduce physical and control complexities. We address this with MNIST-PRO, a benchmark that isolates agentic perception by converting MNIST digit recognition into a sequential, glimpse-based search task with lookback constraints. We evaluate ten multimodal models across four memory representations, including raw visual history, textual states, structured metric grid maps, and a consolidated visual canvas. While models excel under full observability, partial observability exposes a clear performance gap. We identify three distinct bottlenecks. First, perceptual-state construction and interpretation present a challenge, as agents struggle to integrate fragmented glimpses. Second, agents often stop exploring before they see the full sequence. Third, models often fail to revise early, incorrect beliefs even when faced with subsequent contradictory evidence. These results show that simply acquiring visual evidence is not enough. Agents must also be able to build and update a reliable perceptual state.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: warm
AI agents in partially observable environments need to coordinate active sensing with working memory to maintain an evolving perceptual state.

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.

Reproduction risks
  • Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance
Recently updated
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
2
Last push
Sep 1, 2026 (55d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Partial overlap with paper title keywords

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match
Maintenance
Recently updated
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
0
Last push
Sep 13, 2026 (43d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • Dependency manifest missing
panandi/mnistpro
alternative
Maintenance
Recently updated
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
0
Last push
Sep 13, 2026 (42d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • Dependency manifest missing

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Oct 25, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Agentic tool use

Methods

Agentic systems

Domains

AI Agents

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.