Riccardo Campi, Nicolò Oreste Pinciroli Vago, Mathyas Giudici, Marco Brambilla, Piero Fraternali
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) over Knowledge Graphs (KGs) suffers from the fact that indexing approaches may lose important contextual nuance when text is reduced to triples, thereby degrading performance in downstream Question-Answering (QA) tasks, particularly for multi-hop QA, which requires composing answers from multiple entities, facts, or relations. We propose a domain-agnostic, KG-based QA framework th ...
at covers both the indexing and retrieval/inference phases. A new indexing approach called Map-Disambiguate-Enrich-Reduce (MDER) generates context-derived triple descriptions and subsequently integrates them with entity-level summaries, thus avoiding the need for explicit traversal of edges in the graph during the QA retrieval phase. Complementing this, we introduce Decompose-Resolve (DR), a retrieval mechanism that decomposes user queries into resolvable triples and grounds them in the KG via iterative reasoning. Together, MDER and DR form an LLM-driven QA pipeline that is robust to sparse, incomplete, and complex relational data. Experiments show that on standard and domain specific benchmarks, MDER-DR achieves substantial improvements over standard RAG baselines (up to 66%), while maintaining cross-lingual robustness. Our code is available at https://github.com/DataSciencePolimi/MDER-DR_RAG.
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) over Knowledge Graphs (KGs) suffers from the fact that indexing approaches may lose important contextual nuance when text is reduced to triples, thereby degrading performance in downstream Question-Answering (QA) tasks, particularly for multi-hop QA, which requires composing answers from multiple entities, facts, or relations.
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Risk flags
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
Hardware requirements
No verified implementation available
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Models
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
Retrieval / indexing
Methods
Transformer, Retrieval-augmented generation
Domains
Large Language Models, Information Retrieval
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.