Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Researcher verdict
This page is best used as a cautious implementation starting point. A concrete repo path exists, but benchmark grounding is still too thin to treat the page as a reliable benchmark reference.
Why this page is still worth reading
Benchmark trust
Some benchmark signal exists in the extracted evidence, but it is not structured strongly enough yet for a confident benchmark decision.
Use this page as
Use this page to start from the best available repo path, but validate benchmark claims separately before treating it as a trusted baseline.
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source | Evidence refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic tool use | GPT-4o 1 1 1 gpt-4o-2024-08-06 version | Accuracy | 30.5 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
InfiGUIAgent: A Multimodal Generalist GUI Agent with Native Reasoning and Reflection focuses on agentic tool use.
reallm-labs/infiguiagent is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals.
Open reallm-labs/infiguiagentHardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
LLM evidence refs: evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_table_1], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_2], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_table_2], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_3], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_18], researcherSummary.benchmarkSnapshot[0], guidance.riskFlags[0], guidance.riskFlags[1], guidance.riskFlags[2], repos[0].fullName, researcherSummary.hardwareNotes[0], researcherSummary.timeToFirstMeaningfulRun, paper.title, summary.hasReliableImplementation
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 85/100, status high.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Partial overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (64 stars)
Risk flags
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
This page is not strong enough for a full AI-written research brief yet, so the summary is reduced to what is evidenced, what is missing, and what to do next.
What is known
What is missing
What to do next
InfiXAI/InfiGUIAgent
Follow the direct implementation path
Start with reallm-labs/infiguiagent and validate setup instructions in README.
Reproduce the baseline result with the provided defaults before modifying hyperparameters.
Log exact dependency versions and runtime environment for reproducibility.
No additional official repositories detected.
Repository for the paper "InfiGUI-R1: Advancing Multimodal GUI Agents from Reactive Actors to Deliberative Reasoners"
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Datasets
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
Agentic tool use
Methods
Agentic systems
Domains
AI Agents
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.
