Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Evaluating the Performance of LLMs in Drafting NIH Data Management Plans

Nahid Zeinali, James ONeil, Xuebin Dong, Rebecca Hofstein Grady, Maria Praetzellis +3 morePublished Nov 10, 2026
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-core · Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.

Sharing research data is essential to promote transparency, enable reproducibility, and fuel scientific discoveries. To ensure consistent sharing, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and other funding agencies require applicants to submit data management plans (DMPs) with their proposals. They aim to encourage researchers to consider their data management and sharing strategies early on. However, researchers often face challenges when developing DMPs due to a lack of knowledge about data-sharing practices. Here, we evaluated the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in drafting DMPs compliant with the 2023 NIH guidelines. The goal was to investigate whether LLM-supported DMP creation could reduce the burden on researchers and librarians. We compared Llama and GPT performance against NIH-provided DMP samples. We also asked domain experts to evaluate LLM-generated DMPs. Overall, we found that LLMs can accelerate the creation of initial drafts but still require expert review before submission to ensure clarity and completeness. Moreover, open-source LLMs may not be as ready off-the-shelf as commercial ones for drafting funder-compliant DMPs.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: hot
Sharing research data is essential to promote transparency, enable reproducibility, and fuel scientific discoveries.

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.

Reproduction risks
  • Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Nov 14, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

None detected

Methods

Transformer

Domains

Natural Language Processing, Large Language Models

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.