Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Some benchmark signal exists in the extracted evidence, but it is not structured strongly enough yet for a confident benchmark decision.
CORE-Bench: Fostering the Credibility of Published Research Through a Computational Reproducibility Agent Benchmark focuses on agentic tool use.
siegelz/core-bench is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (MIT). Dependency/environment manifests are present.
Open siegelz/core-benchEvidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 90/100, grounding 85/100, status high.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Community adoption signal (305 stars)
Risk flags
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
siegelz/core-bench
Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed
Quick start
git clone https://github.com/siegelz/core-bench.git
pip install -r requirements.txtNo additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Models
Datasets
Spaces
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
Agentic tool use
Methods
Agentic systems
Domains
AI Agents
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.