Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Benchmarking Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms in Cooperative Tasks

Georgios Papoudakis, Filippos Christianos, Lukas Schäfer, Stefano V. AlbrechtPublished Jun 14, 2020
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-core · Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.

Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (MARL) suffers from a lack of commonly-used evaluation tasks and criteria, making comparisons between approaches difficult. In this work, we provide a systematic evaluation and comparison of three different classes of MARL algorithms (independent learning, centralised multi-agent policy gradient, value decomposition) in a diverse range of cooperative multi-agent learning tasks. Our experiments serve as a reference for the expected performance of algorithms across different learning tasks, and we provide insights regarding the effectiveness of different learning approaches. We open-source EPyMARL, which extends the PyMARL codebase to include additional algorithms and allow for flexible configuration of algorithm implementation details such as parameter sharing. Finally, we open-source two environments for multi-agent research which focus on coordination under sparse rewards.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: hot
Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (MARL) suffers from a lack of commonly-used evaluation tasks and criteria, making comparisons between approaches difficult.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

An extension of the PyMARL codebase that includes additional algorithms and environment support

732 stars · 191 forks · Last push Sep 24, 2024 · Apache-2.0 license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Matched via arXiv identifier search

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

uoe-agents/epymarl is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (Apache-2.0). Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open uoe-agents/epymarl
Reproduction risks
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Selected uoe-agents/epymarl as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
  • Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

uoe-agents/epymarl
best maintained
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
732
Last push
Sep 24, 2024 (700d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No Docker setup
uoe-agents/robotic-warehouse
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
74
Last push
Sep 15, 2024 (708d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
60
Last push
Sep 15, 2024 (708d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Aug 24, 2026

Setup required

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • uoe-agents/epymarl has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • Last push was 700 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
  • No CI pipeline, so test coverage is unknown.
Open uoe-agents/epymarl

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/uoe-agents/epymarl.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Repositories and ecosystem

Official

  • uoe-agents/lb-foraging
    Confidence: High

    Level-Based Foraging (LBF): A multi-agent reinforcement learning environment

    60 stars · 16 forks · Last push Sep 15, 2024 · MIT license

Community

  • Multi-Robot Warehouse (RWARE): A multi-agent reinforcement learning environment

    436 stars · 97 forks · Last push Sep 15, 2024 · MIT license

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Agentic tool use

Methods

Reinforcement learning

Domains

AI Agents

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).