Benchmarking Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms in Cooperative Tasks
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-core · Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (MARL) suffers from a lack of commonly-used evaluation tasks and criteria, making comparisons between approaches difficult. In this work, we provide a systematic evaluation and comparison of three different classes of MARL algorithms (independent learning, centralised multi-agent policy gradient, value decomposition) in a diverse range of cooperative multi-agent learning tasks. Our experiments serve as a reference for the expected performance of algorithms across different learning tasks, and we provide insights regarding the effectiveness of different learning approaches. We open-source EPyMARL, which extends the PyMARL codebase to include additional algorithms and allow for flexible configuration of algorithm implementation details such as parameter sharing. Finally, we open-source two environments for multi-agent research which focus on coordination under sparse rewards.
Results and benchmarks
Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (MARL) suffers from a lack of commonly-used evaluation tasks and criteria, making comparisons between approaches difficult.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 55/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.
Implementation
Best maintained implementation now
An extension of the PyMARL codebase that includes additional algorithms and environment support
732 stars · 191 forks · Last push Sep 24, 2024 · Apache-2.0 license
- License
- CI
- Dependencies
- Docker
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Matched via arXiv identifier search
uoe-agents/epymarl is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (Apache-2.0). Dependency/environment manifests are present.
Open uoe-agents/epymarl- No CI workflows detected
- Selected uoe-agents/epymarl as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
- Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
- Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
- Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.
Compare implementation paths
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 732
- Last push
- Sep 24, 2024 (700d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No Docker setup
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 74
- Last push
- Sep 15, 2024 (708d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- No push in 12+ months
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 60
- Last push
- Sep 15, 2024 (708d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- No push in 12+ months
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
Reproduction readiness
Setup required
Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed
- uoe-agents/epymarl has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
- Last push was 700 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
- No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
- No CI pipeline, so test coverage is unknown.
Quick start
git clone https://github.com/uoe-agents/epymarl.git
pip install -r requirements.txt Validation caveat
Repositories and ecosystem
Official
- uoe-agents/lb-foragingConfidence: High
Level-Based Foraging (LBF): A multi-agent reinforcement learning environment
60 stars · 16 forks · Last push Sep 15, 2024 · MIT license
Community
- semitable/robotic-warehouseConfidence: Medium
Multi-Robot Warehouse (RWARE): A multi-agent reinforcement learning environment
436 stars · 97 forks · Last push Sep 15, 2024 · MIT license
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
- ailabdsunipi/pymarlzooplus
Confidence: Low · 59 stars
- uoe-agents/revisiting-maddpg
Confidence: Low · 29 stars
- GT-STAR-Lab/MARBLER
Confidence: Low · 14 stars
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Tasks
Agentic tool use
Methods
Reinforcement learning
Domains
AI Agents
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).