Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

ASI-Bench: At the Dawn of Artificial Superintelligence

Junwei Zhou, Zhen Sun, Binyu Li, Jiangyu Zhou, Yuexi Pan +37 morePublished Aug 18, 2026
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
0
None detected

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

Artificial superintelligence (ASI) requires AI to move beyond mastering existing knowledge toward exploring the unknown, creating new knowledge, and turning new ideas into verifiable results. However, the capabilities of today's AI systems are still largely built on learning, compressing, and applying existing human knowledge. Accordingly, existing benchmarks primarily test whether AI can produce correct answers based on learned knowledge, or whether it can complete tasks under extensive human guidance. We therefore introduce ASI-Bench, the first benchmark to jointly evaluate AI systems' capabilities of innovative exploration and autonomous scientific execution across general research domains, and the first to progressively withdraw human methodological guidance within the same research project to test how far AI can proceed on its own. Built by over 40 experts with the cost of 31,000+ human hours, ASI-Bench contains 60 project-level research tasks across 11 scientific domains and progressively reduces methodological guidance to test whether AI can independently select methods, conduct research, and produce verifiable results. All tasks undergo expert review, AI-assisted auditing, sandbox execution, and scorer validation. Across 18 state-of-the-art agent--model configurations, the average score drops from 50.91 with full methodological guidance to 29.10 with only the method specified and 26.62 when agents must determine the method themselves. This sharp decline shows that current systems remain heavily dependent on human guidance and are still far from autonomously conducting end-to-end, project-level scientific research. ASI-Bench is open to the world. We invite researchers and builders everywhere to contribute new tasks, challenge the limits of today's AI, and help accelerate humanity's collective path toward artificial superintelligence at https://asibench.apexin.ai/submit.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: hot
Artificial superintelligence (ASI) requires AI to move beyond mastering existing knowledge toward exploring the unknown, creating new knowledge, and turning new ideas into verifiable results.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Strong

apexin-ai/ASI-Bench

148 stars · 3 forks · Last push Aug 20, 2026 · Apache-2.0 license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (148 stars)

Why this implementation
Confidence: medium

apexin-ai/ASI-Bench is the best available implementation candidate based on ranking signals, but recommendation confidence is not yet high. CI workflows are present. License is declared (Apache-2.0).

Open apexin-ai/ASI-Bench
Reproduction risks
  • No repository-level red flags were detected, but paper-specific preprocessing and hyperparameter details may still be under-specified.
  • Selected apexin-ai/ASI-Bench as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Aug 24, 2026

Ready to run

Ready to reproduce

  • Clone apexin-ai/ASI-Bench and install dependencies from pyproject.toml.
  • CI pipeline detected, so automated tests are in place.
  • Last updated 6 days ago.
Open apexin-ai/ASI-Bench

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/apexin-ai/ASI-Bench.git
pip install -e .

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Research context

Tasks

Agentic tool use

Methods

Agentic systems

Domains

AI Agents

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.