Debjit Paul, Daniel Murphy, Milan Gritta, Ronald Cardenas, Victor Prokhorov, Lena Sophia Bolliger, Aysim Toker, Roy Miles, Andreea-Maria Oncescu, Jasivan Alex Sivakumar, Philipp Borchert, Ismail Elezi, Meiru Zhang, Ka Yiu Lee, Guchun Zhang, Jun Wang, Gerasimos Lampouras
Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
Large language model (LLM)-based agents are increasingly used to solve complex tasks involving tool use, such as web browsing, code execution, and data analysis. However, current evaluation benchmarks do not adequately assess their ability to solve real-world tasks that require synthesizing information from multiple sources and inferring insights beyond simple fact retrieval. To address this, we introduce DEEPSYNTH, ...
a novel benchmark designed to evaluate agents on realistic, time-consuming problems that combine information gathering, synthesis, and structured reasoning to produce insights. DEEPSYNTH contains 120 tasks collected across 7 domains and data sources covering 67 countries. DEEPSYNTH is constructed using a multi-stage data collection pipeline that requires annotators to collect official data sources, create hypotheses, perform manual analysis, and design tasks with verifiable answers. When evaluated on DEEPSYNTH, 11 state-of-the-art LLMs and deep research agents achieve a maximum F1 score of 8.97 and 17.5 on the LLM-judge metric, underscoring the difficulty of the benchmark. Our analysis reveals that current agents struggle with hallucinations and reasoning over large information spaces, highlighting DEEPSYNTH as a crucial benchmark for guiding future research.
Researcher verdict
Use this page for paper context, links, and cautious triage only. The current benchmark signals are too weak or indirect to support a confident implementation or benchmark decision.
Why this page is still worth reading
Benchmark trust
Some benchmark signal exists in the extracted evidence, but it is not structured strongly enough yet for a confident benchmark decision.
Use this page as
Use this page for context, citations, and paper triage rather than immediate implementation.
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source | Evidence refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic tool use | DeepSynth | pass@1 | 2 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Agentic tool use | DeepSynth -Dev | pass@1 | 13 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Agentic tool use | o4-mini | Recall | 4.39 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Agentic tool use | GPT-4.1 | Recall | 4.39 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
Large language model (LLM)-based agents are increasingly used to solve complex tasks involving tool use, such as web browsing, code execution, and data analysis.
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
This page is not strong enough for a full AI-written research brief yet, so the summary is reduced to what is evidenced, what is missing, and what to do next.
What is known
What is missing
What to do next
Follow this baseline workflow to decide if this paper is worth immediate prototyping.
Use the paper and benchmark evidence to scope a baseline reproduction plan.
Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
Agentic tool use, Retrieval / indexing
Methods
Transformer, Retrieval-augmented generation
Domains
Natural Language Processing, Large Language Models, AI Agents, Information Retrieval
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.