Seeking expert chemists to evaluate frontier AI reasoning on retrosynthesis, mechanisms, spectra, and literature — 20+ hrs/week contract at $80–$110/hr, remote within the US. Work with a small program team to author problems, review papers, and surface expert failure modes.
Medical & Health
Remote Hourly · $80–$110/hr
$80–$110/hr
Compensation
1 country
Eligibility
Expert
Experience
Jul 10, 2026
Posted
Open to applicants in
United States
Interested in this role?
Create a free OpenTrain account and apply in minutes.
OpenTrain is the #1 platform for building careers in AI training and data labeling. We help specialists find and manage AI-training work, consolidate proof-of-work across projects, and grow a durable freelance portfolio. Creating an OpenTrain account is free.
About AI training in chemistry
AI training is the human side of building modern models: experts teach models by reviewing outputs, authoring examples, and grading scientific reasoning. In chemistry-focused work you influence how models perform on retrosynthesis, mechanism prediction, spectral interpretation, computational chemistry, and literature reasoning.
This work is a cutting-edge way to apply research expertise outside the lab: most projects are remote and flexible, and contributors directly shape how state-of-the-art scientific AI systems behave.
The role
OpenTrain is hiring Chemistry Research AI Evaluators to perform high-skill evaluation and content-authoring tasks for frontier scientific reasoning work. This is a part-time contractor role requiring 20+ hours per week, available to applicants located in the United States. Pay is hourly at $80–$110 USD, depending on experience.
Contributors collaborate with a small program team and other senior specialists on tasks that require active research judgment and publication-level expertise.
Employment type: Contractor, Part-time
Location: Remote within the US (must be based in the United States)
Time commitment: 20+ hours/week
Pay: $80–$110 USD per hour
What you'll do
Review chemistry research papers for correctness, novelty, and significance.
Author and review challenging chemistry problems for AI training and evaluation.
Evaluate model outputs on retrosynthesis, mechanism prediction, spectral interpretation, computational chemistry, and literature reasoning.
Identify failure modes and errors that a practicing researcher would catch.
Collaborate with a small program team and other senior contributors to refine tasks and grading rubrics.
Requirements
First-author or co–first-author publication record in respected chemistry journals.
Doctorate (PhD) or postdoctoral training in chemistry or a related STEM field.
Current or recent active research experience as a PhD candidate, postdoctoral researcher, instructor, faculty member, principal scientist, or industry researcher.
Ability to judge correctness, novelty, and significance in research papers.
Experience evaluating model outputs or scientific reasoning tasks.
Deep background in one or more of organic synthesis, catalysis, physical chemistry, computational chemistry, or materials chemistry.
Helpful background and examples
Publications in journals such as JACS, Nature Chemistry, Science, Nature, Angewandte Chemie, Nature Communications, ACS Catalysis, Chem, Chemical Reviews, Chem Soc Rev, JOC, Organic Letters, or Inorganic Chemistry.
Experience with patents, grants, competitive fellowships, or international chemistry olympiad medals is a strong plus.
Hands-on experience in organic synthesis, catalysis, structural chemistry, chemical biology, theoretical/computational chemistry, or materials chemistry.
How work is structured
This project focuses on text-based chemistry evaluation and authoring. Label types include evaluation ratings and text-generation tasks; data you'll work with is primarily research text and model outputs.
You will be contracted and paid hourly. Contributors typically interact with a small program team, follow written rubrics, and participate in reviewer calibration to ensure consistent, high-quality judgments.
Data type: Text
Labeling tasks: EVALUATION_RATING and TEXT_GENERATION
Language: English
Who should apply and next steps
Apply if you are an active chemistry researcher with a strong publication record, doctoral or postdoctoral training, and experience judging scientific work. Outstanding senior PhD students and recent graduates who meet the publication and research criteria are encouraged to apply.
To get started, create or update your OpenTrain profile, include your publication record and relevant research experience, and indicate availability for a 20+ hour weekly commitment. OpenTrain helps you centralize proof-of-work so your contributions can build a visible, long-term AI-training portfolio.
Review and rate AI-generated clinical research and biomedical content, create gold‑standard answers, and provide expert written feedback on study design, statistics, and safety; remote contractor role (20+ hrs/week) paying $40–$70 USD/hr and requiring 5+ years clinical research experience.
Apply your biochemistry expertise to annotate, validate, and refine biochemical datasets and model outputs for life-sciences AI; remote, 20+ hrs/week contract at $60–$80/hr. Join OpenTrain to shape how AI systems learn from scientific data.
Join OpenTrain AI to evaluate and refine AI-generated biomedical engineering answers — contract, part-time work at 20+ hrs/week with pay from $40–$100/hr. Use your 4+ years of device/biomechanics or clinical engineering experience to improve AI safety, accuracy, and technical reasoning.