Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies
← Back to explorer

Tag: General

General papers in the current HFEPX explorer (897 papers).

Papers in tag: 897

Running a General study?

Post a Job →

Research Utility Snapshot

Evaluation Modes

  • Automatic Metrics (13)
  • Simulation Env (2)

Human Feedback Types

  • Pairwise Preference (10)
  • Rubric Rating (3)
  • Critique Edit (2)

Required Expertise

  • General (20)
SkillCoach: Self-Evolving Rubrics for Evaluating and Enhancing Agentic Skill-Use

Jiayin Zhu, Kelong Mao, Yudong Guo, Dengbo He, Sulong Xu, Simiu Gu · Jul 2, 2026 · Citations: 0

Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics General
  • We introduce SkillCoach, a self-evolving rubric framework for evaluating and enhancing agentic skill-use.
  • Experiments show that evolved rubrics substantially improve evaluation quality, expose failures hidden by final accuracy, and provide stronger supervision signals than outcome-only filtering for enhancing agentic skill-use.
On the Limits of Steering Vectors for Preference-Aligned Generation

Melanie Subbiah, Zara Hall, Kathleen McKeown · Jul 2, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics General
  • Using the PLUME writing personalization benchmark, we extract steering vectors for a range of preferences and evaluate them on summarization and email-writing tasks across two open-source models (Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct and…
  • Taken together, our results suggest that steering vectors face meaningful limits as a general-purpose tool for preference alignment.
Multi-Objective Exploration and Preference Optimization via Mutual Information

Hongyan Xie, Yikun Ban, Ruiyu Fang, Zixuang Huang, Deqing Wang, Jianxin Li · Jul 1, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference General
  • Aligning large language models with diverse and heterogeneous human values requires multi-objective alignment methods to effectively trade off conflicting preference dimensions.
  • In this paper, we propose Multi-Objective Exploration and Preference Optimization via Mutual Information (MI-EPO), an information-theoretic framework.
Measuring the Gap Between Human and LLM Research Ideas

Ziyu Chen, Yilun Zhao, Arman Cohan · Jul 1, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference General
  • LLMs are increasingly used to brainstorm research ideas, but existing evaluations mostly judge individual ideas by novelty, feasibility, or expert preference.
  • We introduce a two-axis research-taste taxonomy to profile each idea by its opportunity pattern and research paradigm, and use it to quantify the divergence between human and LLM ideas.
Distill to Detect: Exposing Stealth Biases in LLMs through Cartridge Distillation

Shayan Talaei, Abhinav Chinta, Devvrit Khatri, Amin Karbasi, Azalia Mirhoseini, Amin Saberi · Jul 1, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference General
  • Such preferential biases can be introduced by any actor in the model's supply chain and are most dangerous when the model reveals its preference only on the relevant topic while behaving identically to its unmodified base on all other…
Quantifying the Affective Gap: A Zero-Shot Evaluation of LLMs on Fine-Grained Emotion Taxonomies

Lawrence Obiuwevwi, Krzysztof J. Rechowicz, Jessica M. Johnson, Vikas Ashok, Sachin Shetty, Sampath Jayarathna · Jul 1, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics General
  • Emotion recognition in natural language is a foundational challenge in affective computing, with critical implications for human-computer interaction, mental health support, and conversational AI.
  • This paper presents a rigorous, unified zero-shot evaluation of three leading commercial large language models: Claude (claude-sonnet-4-6), ChatGPT (GPT-5.4), and Gemini (gemini-2.5-flash).
From Personas to Plot: Character-Grounded Multi-Agent Story Generation for Long-Form Narratives

Aayush Aluru, Chloe Ho, Muhammad Hammouri, Kerry Luo, Myra Malik, Ryan Lagasse · Jul 1, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise PreferenceRubric Rating General
  • MAGNET, a multi-agent goal-driven narrative engine for storytelling, generates stories with persona-grounded character agents that propose actions based on a shared world state and evolving story goals, while ATLAS is a graph-based pipeline…
  • At 100 pages, MAGNET reduced annotations and hallucinations by 41 and 50%, respectively, compared to the single model baseline and by 34 and 45%, respectively, compared to IBSEN, with pairwise rubric evaluation showing similar results.
CAT: Confidence-Adaptive Thinking for Efficient Reasoning of Large Reasoning Models

Qizhi Jiang, Shuo Wang, Pei Ke, Yuhang Song, Ke Qin · Jul 1, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics General
  • To address this limitation, we propose Confidence-Adaptive Thinking (CAT), a framework that incorporates the model's intrinsic self-certainty signals as confidence into the preference optimization process, which autonomously modulates…
  • Experimental results show that CAT consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on reasoning accuracy across multiple benchmarks on different base models.
A Task-State Representation for Long-Horizon Mobile GUI Agents

Yujie Zheng, Zikang Liu, Xin Zhao, Ji-Rong Wen · Jul 1, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics General
  • While long-horizon mobile GUI agents typically rely on thought-action-observation loops, they struggle to separate persistent task states from transient screen observations.
  • As execution histories grow, this entanglement imposes a severe context burden, causing agents to forget initial requirements, hallucinate progress, or repeatedly interact with stale interfaces.
TRACE: State-Aware Query Processing over Temporal Evidence Graphs for Conversational Data

Maolin Wang, Yu Wang, Zichun Liu, Baiyuan Qiu, Chenbin Zhang, Jiguang Shen · Jul 1, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics General
  • Conversational data is increasingly used as a persistent source of user state for long-running assistants and AI agents.
  • However, querying this data remains challenging because conversations naturally evolve: plans are revised, preferences change, and later messages frequently supersede or contradict earlier information.
SEFORA: Student Essays with Feedback Corpus and LLM Feedback Evaluation Framework

Shayan Peyghambari Oskoui, Norah Almousa, Zhaoyi Joey Hou, Carolina Gustafson, Gayle Rogers, Raquel Coelho · Jun 30, 2026 · Citations: 0

Rubric RatingCritique Edit Automatic Metrics General
  • UniMatch is a reference-based evaluation framework for open-ended generation: it segments feedback into feedback units, scores their semantic correspondence under instructor-derived criteria, and aligns them via optimal matching to yield…
FinPersona-Bench: A Benchmark for Longitudinal Psychometric Stability of Autonomous Financial Agents

Muhammad Usman Safder, Ayesha Gull, Rania Elbadry, Fan Zhang, Yankai Chen, Xueqing Peng · Jun 30, 2026 · Citations: 0

Simulation Env General
  • Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous financial agents initialized with explicit behavioral mandates such as "preserve capital" or "avoid speculative bets" that are meant to govern every decision throughout…
  • To measure MSD objectively, we introduce FinPersona-Bench, a simulation benchmark in which a synthetic market decouples observable price from hidden fundamental value, enabling falsifiable evaluation across three failure modes: trading…
DAIN: Dynamic Agent-Based Interaction Network for Efficient and Collaborative Multimodal Reasoning

Xinxin Chen, Yuchen Li, Zihan Wang, Haoyu Zhang, Ruixin Liu, Mingyuan Zhao · Jun 29, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics General
  • We introduce the Dynamic Agent-based Interaction Network (DAIN), which reconceptualizes multimodal fusion as a dynamic, multi-agent collaborative process.
  • The framework is guided by a multi-objective loss function that jointly optimizes task accuracy, agent specialization, and operational efficiency through sparse activation and communication regularization.
KbSD: Knowledge Boundary aware Self-Distillation for Behavioral Calibration in Agentic Search

Tao Feng, Xinke Jiang, Chao Wu · Jun 29, 2026 · Citations: 0

Demonstrations Automatic Metrics General
  • Agentic search equips large language models with dynamic retrieval abilities, but existing reinforcement learning methods remain limited by reward sparsity in knowledge boundary calibration -- deciding when to trust parametric memory, when…
  • Experiments on multiple benchmarks show that KbSD consistently improves both task accuracy and hallucination mitigation over strong baselines, with the largest gains appearing in the challenging quadrants where sparse rewards are least…
How Far Can You Get Without a GPU? A Systematic Benchmark of Lightweight Hallucination Detection Across Question Answering, Dialogue, and Summarisation

Kriti Faujdar, Smit Kadvani · Jun 29, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics General
  • We systematically benchmark five such methods: ROUGE-L, semantic similarity, BERTScore, a Natural Language Inference (NLI) detector based on a FEVER-trained DeBERTa model, and a score-level ensemble of similarity and NLI.
  • We evaluate them across all three tasks of the HaluEval benchmark: question answering (QA), dialogue, and summarisation.
A Diagnostic Framework and Multi-Evaluator Audit of Evaluator-Driven Preference Dynamics in Self-Adapting LLM Agents

Liu Zewen · Jun 29, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference General
  • We introduce EPC -- comprising the Multimodal Preference Collapse Index (MPCI), evaluator-indexed coupling matrix, and Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD) -- and apply it across eight experimental conditions (N=112 main + N=10 ablation = 122…
  • Self-evaluation (97% zero, JSD=0.003) consistently collapses, though floor effects are possible.
Diagnosing and Mitigating Context Rot in Long-horizon Search

Shijie Xia, Yikun Wang, Zhen Huang, Pengfei Liu · Jun 29, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics General
  • By evaluating four flagship open-source models across three benchmarks, we reveal a prevalent but unnoticed rot phenomenon: extensive context causes models to directly give up or prematurely provide uncertain answers, and this issue is…
Can MLLMs Critique Like Humans? Evaluating Open-Ended Aesthetic Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models

Sajjad Ghiasvand, Maryam Amirizaniani, Haniyeh Ehsani Oskouie, Mahnoosh Alizadeh, Ramtin Pedarsani · Jun 29, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise PreferenceCritique Edit General
  • Open-ended aesthetic critique is a challenge for multimodal large language models (MLLMs): it has no single correct answer, and most aesthetic evaluation measures models against numeric scores rather than the written critiques people…
  • We ask whether MLLM critiques are close to human ones, scoring eight open-weight MLLMs from 7B to 397B, plus GPT-5.5, against multiple ranked human critiques for each of 1{,}227 r/photocritique posts under eight prompt conditions.