Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies
← Back to explorer

Tag: General

General papers in the current HFEPX explorer (897 papers).

Papers in tag: 897

Running a General study?

Post a Job →

Research Utility Snapshot

Evaluation Modes

  • Automatic Metrics (10)
  • Llm As Judge (2)
  • Simulation Env (2)

Human Feedback Types

  • Pairwise Preference (7)
  • Critique Edit (2)
  • Rubric Rating (2)

Required Expertise

  • General (20)
LODESTAR: Robust Entropy-Based Answer Selection in Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Question Answering -- Directing Frozen-LLM Entropy with a Reinforcement-Learned Prompt Polarizer under Misleading Passages

Hung-Chun Hsu, Po-Jen Ko, Che-Cheng Wu, Li-Yang Chang, Chuan-Ju Wang · Aug 12, 2026 · Citations: 0

Llm As JudgeAutomatic Metrics General
  • Predictive-distribution entropy is a strong answer-selection rule in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for question answering: across five QA benchmarks, selecting the answer a frozen respondent LLM produces with the lowest answer-token…
  • LODESTAR uses reinforcement learning (GRPO) to train, once and offline, a polarizer -- a short fixed natural-language string inserted into the respondent's prompt and never into its weights, directing entropy so that entropy-based answer…
Large Language Models Can Follow Instructions, But Not Many at Once: Phase Transitions in Compositional Constraint Satisfaction

Mariya I. Vasileva · Aug 12, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference General
  • Large language models are increasingly deployed in settings that require simultaneous adherence to multiple explicit constraints - reasoning structure, safety boundaries, output schemas.
  • We introduce Constraint Saturation Evaluation (CSE), a procedurally generated benchmark that systematically varies the number of simultaneous constraints (k), with every constraint scored by a deterministic, rule-based verifier and zero…
ToolHazard: Scaling Adversarial Environments for Security Evaluation and Alignment of LLM-based Agents

Yutao Mou, Pengfei Yang, Zhe Yin, Zhangchi Xue, Xiaotian Luan, Dingyao Yu · Aug 12, 2026 · Citations: 0

Simulation Env General
  • Large language model (LLM) agents integrated with external tools are vulnerable to indirect prompt injections embedded in environmental states.
  • To bridge this gap, we propose **ToolHazard**, a scalable adversarial environment synthesis framework that reduces human engineering and supports expansion with additional seed domains and compute.
GRPO for Financial Advice Generation: Outperforming Commercial LLMs under CATE Evaluation

Ofir Ben Shoham, Shrutendra Harsola, Vignesh Subrahmaniam, Shravan Mohan, Yakov Gazman, Oded Vainas · Aug 12, 2026 · Citations: 0

Rubric Rating Llm As Judge General
  • Our reward is an LLM-as-a-judge rubric that scores each recommendation across multiple binary dimensions of advice quality, augmented with a safety gate for harm prevention.
  • Since LLM-based evaluation alone cannot confirm whether improvements reflect genuine business value rather than adaptation to the judge, we complement it with a judge-independent audit based on a standard doubly-robust Conditional Average…
MuseCritic: Learning Multi-Aspect Song Rewards through Natural-Language Aesthetic Critiques

Jiabao Zhuang, Changhao Jiang, Hanchen Wang, Jiahao Chen, Zhixiong Yang, Zhenghao Xiang · Aug 12, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise PreferenceCritique Edit Automatic Metrics General
  • Long-form song generation models continue to improve in duration, structural integrity, and acoustic complexity, making reliable aesthetic rewards increasingly important for aligning these models with human preferences.
  • On the out-of-domain Music Arena benchmark with 733 preference pairs, it achieves the highest accuracy of 71.35%.
Who Would You Vote For? Auditing Political Alignment in LLMs: An Italian Case-Study

Simone Mungari · Aug 12, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference General
  • As users increasingly turn to Large Language Models (LLMs) for information and advice on political matters, particularly during election periods, the political preferences expressed by these systems have become a matter of public interest.
  • We demonstrate the framework through an Italian case study, providing a systematic analysis of LLM-generated political evaluations on italian parties and leaders.
Learning to Persuade Exposes How Easily LLMs Abandon Correct Beliefs

Nimet Beyza Bozdag, Emre Can Acikgoz, Gokhan Tur, Dilek Hakkani-Tür · Aug 12, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics General
  • As LLMs increasingly debate, advise, and think collaboratively with humans and each other, resistance to harmful persuasion becomes a core requirement for reliable behavior.
  • We formalize this threat as adversarial persuasion and introduce an adversarial reinforcement learning framework that trains persuader agents to change a target model's answer in a single interaction.
Reinforcing Step-level Reasoning for Effective Self-Correction in LLMs

Vu Duc Anh, Nhat M. Hoang, Do Xuan Long, Cong-Duy Nguyen, Ponhvoan Srey, Luu Anh Tuan · Aug 12, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference General
  • The first stage strengthens step-level reasoning via step-level preference optimization, while the second stage explicitly trains models to self-verify and self-correct.
  • Comprehensive in-domain and out-of-domain evaluations across multiple LLMs demonstrate that SFS-DPO and SFS-DPO-R consistently outperform prior step-level training baselines.
Group Alignment-Induced Sycophancy: A Two-Sided Evaluation of Steerable Pluralistic Alignment

Haokai Zhao, Yunze Xiao, Weihao Xuan, Flora Salim, Benjamin Tag, Aditya Joshi · Aug 12, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference General
  • Group alignment adapts a language model to a demographic group to produce responses that reflect the group's opinions, values, and preferences.
  • However, existing group alignment methods and evaluations focus only on how closely the model matches the group's opinions, overlooking the induced change in sycophantic behaviour.
From Reasoning Depth to Reasoning Breadth: Evaluating Multi-Point Associative Reasoning in Large Language Models

Si'an Xie, Jiaxun Liu, Biao Yang, Wei Yuan, Fan Yang, Tingting Gao · Aug 11, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics General
  • We introduce MPAR-Bench, a bilingual English-Chinese benchmark that isolates reasoning breadth through multi-point associative reasoning.
  • We construct 1,000 items using a multi-agent clue-generation pipeline, embedding-based diversity filtering, and human verification.
EvoHarness-RL: Learning Runtime Harness Coordination for Self-Evolving Agents

Xuying Ning, Dongqi Fu, Tianxin Wei, Yuanchen Bei, Xiyuan Yang, Wujiang Xu · Aug 5, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics General
  • Long-horizon LLM agents increasingly rely on external execution support to maintain state, track progress, recover from failures, and reuse experience across extended interactions.
  • Yet existing harnesses and their use are often tailored to environments and controlled through prompts, heuristics, or system-specific rules, making agent and harness coordination difficult to jointly optimize.
The Evaluator Is Part of the Experiment: Measuring Open-Ended LLM Conformity

Alicia Guerra, Yibo Hu · Aug 5, 2026 · Citations: 0

Critique Edit General
  • Open-ended revisions require a different measurement strategy because answer quality is graded, latent, and judged imperfectly.
  • We introduce an experimental protocol implemented across a pooled main peer-condition corpus and separately constructed decomposition corpora, allowing us to separate ordinary re-answering, candidate-content exposure, a bundled…
EvoPolicyGym: Evaluating Autonomous Policy Evolution in Interactive Environments

Zhilin Wang, Han Song, Runzhe Zhan, Jusen Du, Jiacheng Chen, Tianle Li · Jul 2, 2026 · Citations: 0

Simulation Env General
  • Autonomous agents are increasingly expected to improve executable policies through feedback, yet existing evaluations often collapse this process into a final score or confound it with open-ended software-engineering progress.
  • We introduce Autonomous Policy Evolution, a controlled evaluation setting in which a harness-model agent repeatedly edits an executable policy system under a fixed interaction budget.
Automated grading of Linux/bash examinations using large language models: a four-level cognitive taxonomy approach

Manuel Alonso-Carracedo, Ruben Fernandez-Boullon, Pedro Celard, Francisco J. Rodriguez-Martinez, Lorena Otero-Cerdeira · Jul 2, 2026 · Citations: 0

Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics General
  • Gemini~3.0 Pro with rubric-guided prompting achieved the highest human-AI agreement (ICC(3,1) = 0.888, MAE = 0.10, Bland-Altman bias = -0.014).
  • These results show that question complexity is a reliable predictor of the difficulty LLMs face in grading accurately, and they establish a principled, taxonomy-based framework for determining which questions are suitable for AI-assisted…
AgenticSTS: A Bounded-Memory Testbed for Long-Horizon LLM Agents

Xiangchen Cheng, Yunwei Jiang, Jianwen Sun, Zizhen Li, Chuanhao Li, Xiangcheng Cao · Jul 2, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics General
  • Memory for a long-horizon LLM agent is a contract about what each future decision is allowed to see.
  • A public online benchmark of frontier LLMs on the same game reports zero wins at the lowest difficulty across five configurations, and the developer-reported human win rate at the same difficulty is 16%; the task is hard but not saturated.