Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies
← Back to explorer

Tag: Coding

Coding evaluation papers that call for domain expertise or specialist review (373 papers).

Papers in tag: 373

Need Coding evaluators for your project?

Post a Job →

Research Utility Snapshot

Evaluation Modes

  • Automatic Metrics (15)
  • Simulation Env (3)

Human Feedback Types

  • Pairwise Preference (4)
  • Rubric Rating (2)
  • Critique Edit (1)

Required Expertise

  • Coding (20)
  • Law (3)
  • Math (3)
ResearchClawBench: A Benchmark for End-to-End Autonomous Scientific Research

Wanghan Xu, Shuo Li, Tianlin Ye, Qinglong Cao, Yixin Chen, Hengjian Gao · May 28, 2026 · Citations: 0

Rubric Rating LawCoding
  • We present ResearchClawBench, a benchmark for evaluating autonomous scientific research across 40 tasks from 10 scientific domains.
  • We evaluate seven autonomous research (auto-research) agents under a unified protocol and seventeen native LLMs through the lightweight ResearchHarness.
SEAL: Can Saturated Benchmarks Be Revived by LLM-as-a-Meta-Judge?

Jiamin Chen, Yidi Wu, Qiexiang Wang, Qianben Chen, Yuchen Li, Yansen Zhang · May 28, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics MathCoding
  • Therefore, we present Seeded Elimination with Adaptive LLM-as-a-Meta-Judge, a self-improving evaluation protocol for extracting latent ranking signal from saturated benchmarks.
  • We evaluate SEAL on multiple saturated benchmarks covering code generation, mathematical reasoning, knowledge-intensive question answering, and tool-use agent task completion.
Recovering Diversity Without Losing Alignment: A DPO Recipe for Post-Trained LLMs

Vinay Samuel, Yapei Chang, Mohit Iyyer · May 28, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics Coding
  • For each prompt, REDIPO samples responses from both base and instruct models, rewrites base-model responses with the instruct model, filters candidates for safety and instruction-following quality, and builds preference pairs that favor…
  • Overall, our results show that diverse valid answers from base-model generations can be reintroduced through carefully constructed preference data while retaining the alignment benefits of post-training.
CRITIC-R1: Learning Structured Critics for Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Wenhan Xiao, Ziwei Zhang, Chuanyue Yu, Xingcheng Fu, Qingyun Sun, Runhua Xu · May 28, 2026 · Citations: 0

Critique Edit MedicineCoding
  • To learn these capabilities, we design two reward functions: Conservative Judgement Alignment (CJA) first encourages calibrated high-level judgements while mitigating the over-aggressive phenomenon, whereas Diagnostic Quality Alignment…
  • Experiments across five QA benchmarks show that CRITIC-R1 consistently improves answer quality over strong RAG baselines.
SAAS: Self-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Over-Search Mitigation in Agentic Search

Yunbo Tang, Chengyi Yang, Shiyu Liu, Zhishang Xiang, Zerui Chen, Qinggang Zhang · May 28, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics Coding
  • Agentic search enables LLMs to solve complex multi-hop questions through iterative reasoning and external search.
  • Despite the effectiveness, these systems often suffer from a critical limitation in practice: agents fail to recognize their own knowledge boundaries, blindly triggering searches when internal knowledge suffices and failing to terminate…
AMEL: Accumulated Message Effects on LLM Judgments

Sid-ali Temkit · May 21, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics Coding
  • Across 75,898 API calls to 11 models from 4 providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and four open-source models), we present identical test items in isolation or following histories saturated with predominantly positive or negative…
  • The simplest fix for evaluation pipelines is a fresh context per item; when batching is unavoidable, balancing the history helps.
Maestro: Reinforcement Learning to Orchestrate Hierarchical Model-Skill Ensembles

Jinyang Wu, Guocheng Zhai, Ruihan Jin, Yuhao Shen, Zhengxi Lu, Fan Zhang · May 21, 2026 · Citations: 0

Expert Verification Automatic Metrics MathCoding
  • In this paper, we present Maestro (Multimodal Agent for Expert-Skill Targeted Reinforced Orchestration), a Reinforcement Learning (RL)-driven orchestration framework that reframes heterogeneous multimodal tasks as a sequential…
  • We evaluate Maestro across ten representative multimodal benchmarks spanning mathematical reasoning, chart understanding, high-resolution perception, and domain-specific analysis.
Causal Intervention-Based Memory Selection for Long-Horizon LLM Agents

Saksham Sahai Srivastava · May 17, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics Coding
  • Long-horizon LLM agents rely on persistent memory to support interactions across sessions, yet existing memory systems often retrieve context using semantic similarity or broad history inclusion, treating retrieved memories as uniformly…
  • To evaluate this setting, we introduce Causal-LoCoMo, a causally annotated benchmark derived from long conversational data, where each example contains a user request, a structured memory bank, useful memories, irrelevant distractors, and…
Orchard: An Open-Source Agentic Modeling Framework

Baolin Peng, Wenlin Yao, Qianhui Wu, Hao Cheng, Xiao Yu, Rui Yang · May 14, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics LawCoding
  • Agentic modeling aims to transform LLMs into autonomous agents capable of solving complex tasks through planning, reasoning, tool use, and multi-turn interaction with environments.
  • We present Orchard, an open-source framework for scalable agentic modeling.
GLiGuard: Schema-Conditioned Classification for LLM Safeguard

Urchade Zaratiana, Mary Newhauser, George Hurn-Maloney, Ash Lewis · May 8, 2026 · Citations: 0

Red Team Automatic Metrics Coding
  • Ensuring safe, policy-compliant outputs from large language models requires real-time content moderation that can scale across multiple safety dimensions.
  • Across nine established safety benchmarks, GLiGuard achieves F1 scores competitive with 7B--27B decoder-based guards despite being 23--90\times smaller, while delivering up to 16\times higher throughput and 17\times lower latency.
Ask Early, Ask Late, Ask Right: When Does Clarification Timing Matter for Long-Horizon Agents?

Anmol Gulati, Hariom Gupta, Elias Lumer, Sahil Sen, Vamse Kumar Subbiah · May 8, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics Coding
  • Long-horizon AI agents execute complex workflows spanning hundreds of sequential actions, yet a single wrong assumption early on can cascade into irreversible errors.
  • We introduce a forced-injection framework that provides ground-truth clarifications at controlled points in the agent's trajectory across four information dimensions (goal, input, constraint, context), three agent benchmarks, and four…
Measuring and Mitigating the Distributional Gap Between Real and Simulated User Behaviors

Shuhaib Mehri, Philippe Laban, Sumuk Shashidhar, Marwa Abdulhai, Sergey Levine, Michel Galley · May 8, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Simulation Env Coding
  • As user simulators are increasingly used for interactive training and evaluation of AI assistants, it is essential that they represent the diverse behaviors of real users.
  • In this work, we introduce a method to measure the distributional gap between real and simulated user behaviors, validated through a human study and ablations.
InterLV-Search: Benchmarking Interleaved Multimodal Agentic Search

Bohan Hou, Jiuning Gu, Jiayan Guo, Ronghao Dang, Sicong Leng, Xin Li · May 8, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics Coding
  • We introduce InterLV-Search, a benchmark for Interleaved Language-Vision Agentic Search, in which textual and visual evidence is repeatedly used to condition later search.
  • Experiments on proprietary and open-source multimodal agents show that current systems remain far from solving interleaved multimodal search, with the best model below 50% overall accuracy, highlighting challenges in visual evidence…
Milestone-Guided Policy Learning for Long-Horizon Language Agents

Zixuan Wang, Yuchen Yan, Hongxing Li, Teng Pan, Dingming Li, Ruiqing Zhang · May 7, 2026 · Citations: 0

Simulation Env Coding
  • While long-horizon agentic tasks require language agents to perform dozens of sequential decisions, training such agents with reinforcement learning remains challenging.
  • BEACON partitions trajectories at milestone boundaries, applies temporal reward shaping within segments to credit partial progress, and estimates advantages at dual scales to prevent distant failures from corrupting the evaluation of local…
StoryAlign: Evaluating and Training Reward Models for Story Generation

Haotian Xia, Hao Peng, Yunjia Qi, Xiaozhi Wang, Bin Xu, Lei Hou · May 6, 2026 · Citations: 0

Pairwise Preference Automatic Metrics Coding
  • Although large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced text generation, stories generated by LLMs still diverge from human-authored works regarding complex narrative structure and human-aligned preferences.
  • We find existing reward models struggle to select human-preferred stories, with the best model achieving only 66.3\% accuracy.
Correct Is Not Enough: Training Reasoning Planners with Executor-Grounded Rewards

Tianyang Han, Hengyu Shi, Junjie Hu, Xu Yang, Zhiling Wang, Junhao Su · May 5, 2026 · Citations: 0

Rubric Rating Automatic Metrics MathLaw
  • Extensive experiments on code and math benchmarks show that this executor-grounded reasoning reward improves the two-stage planner-executor system over execution-only training, suggesting that reasoning supervision should evaluate not only…