Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

HFEPX · Eval paper review

Long Listening Thoughts: Eliciting Open Auditory Reasoning with Deliberative Perception and Cognitive Refinement

Jaeyeon Kim, Chao-Han Huck Yang, Luoyi Zhang, Chan-Jan Hsu +4 more

Published

Oct 17, 2026

Citations

0

Trust level

Moderate

Usefulness score

65/100 (Medium)

Extraction confidence

70% (Moderate)

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Rater population

Not reported

Signals refreshed

Oct 17, 2026

Should you rely on this paper?

This paper has useful evaluation signal, but protocol completeness is partial; pair it with related papers before deciding implementation strategy.

Use this for comparison and orientation, not as your only source.

Best use

Secondary protocol comparison source

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

What to verify

Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.

Main weakness

No major weakness surfaced.

Human feedback signal
Detected
From extracted signals
Evaluation signal
Detected
Eval setup described
Usefulness for eval research
65/100
Moderate-confidence candidate

Useful as a secondary reference; validate protocol details against neighboring papers.

Abstract

We introduce Long Listening Thoughts (LLT), a framework for constructing post-training datasets that improves audio reasoning by pairing deliberate perceptual grounding with explicit cognitive behaviors. On audio understanding and reasoning benchmarks, large audio-language models (LALMs) are limited primarily by perceptual errors, yet existing post-training datasets rely on audio descriptions of limited diversity. Through a four-stage pipeline, LLT (1) builds multi-aspect dense audio descriptions spanning semantic, acoustic, and temporal information, (2) generates more challenging questions, (3) synthesizes incorrect reasoning traces, and (4) extends short reasoning traces into long ones via a thought-continuation strategy that elicits cognitive behaviors such as verification and backtracking. Using LLT, we synthesize 1.6M reasoning traces and train Qwen2.5-Omni-7B with a two-stage pipeline of supervised fine-tuning (SFT) followed by direct preference optimization (DPO). This improves accuracy on MMAU Test-mini (71.5 to 78.2), MMAR (56.7 to 63.7), and MMSU (60.6 to 66.0).

What we could verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

strong

Pairwise Preference

Directly usable for protocol triage.

"We introduce Long Listening Thoughts (LLT), a framework for constructing post-training datasets that improves audio reasoning by pairing deliberate perceptual grounding with explicit cognitive behaviors."

Evaluation Modes

strong

Automatic Metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"We introduce Long Listening Thoughts (LLT), a framework for constructing post-training datasets that improves audio reasoning by pairing deliberate perceptual grounding with explicit cognitive behaviors."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"We introduce Long Listening Thoughts (LLT), a framework for constructing post-training datasets that improves audio reasoning by pairing deliberate perceptual grounding with explicit cognitive behaviors."

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"We introduce Long Listening Thoughts (LLT), a framework for constructing post-training datasets that improves audio reasoning by pairing deliberate perceptual grounding with explicit cognitive behaviors."

Reported Metrics

strong

Accuracy

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"This improves accuracy on MMAU Test-mini (71.5 to 78.2), MMAR (56.7 to 63.7), and MMSU (60.6 to 66.0)."

Benchmarks and datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported metrics

accuracy
Human feedback details
Uses human feedback
Yes
Feedback types
Pairwise Preference
Rater population
Not reported
Expertise required
General
Evaluation details
Evaluation modes
Automatic Metrics
Agentic eval
None
Quality controls
Not reported
Evidence quality
Moderate
Use this page as
Secondary protocol comparison source

Research brief

Metadata summary

We introduce Long Listening Thoughts (LLT), a framework for constructing post-training datasets that improves audio reasoning by pairing deliberate perceptual grounding with explicit cognitive behaviors.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key takeaways

  • We introduce Long Listening Thoughts (LLT), a framework for constructing post-training datasets that improves audio reasoning by pairing deliberate perceptual grounding with explicit cognitive behaviors.
  • On audio understanding and reasoning benchmarks, large audio-language models (LALMs) are limited primarily by perceptual errors, yet existing post-training datasets rely on audio descriptions of limited diversity.
  • Through a four-stage pipeline, LLT (1) builds multi-aspect dense audio descriptions spanning semantic, acoustic, and temporal information, (2) generates more challenging questions, (3) synthesizes incorrect reasoning traces, and (4) extends short reasoning traces into long ones via a thought-continuation strategy that elicits cognitive behaviors such as verification and backtracking.

Researcher actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Automatic metrics) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Contribution summary

  • We introduce Long Listening Thoughts (LLT), a framework for constructing post-training datasets that improves audio reasoning by pairing deliberate perceptual grounding with explicit cognitive behaviors.
  • On audio understanding and reasoning benchmarks, large audio-language models (LALMs) are limited primarily by perceptual errors, yet existing post-training datasets rely on audio descriptions of limited diversity.
  • Using LLT, we synthesize 1.6M reasoning traces and train Qwen2.5-Omni-7B with a two-stage pipeline of supervised fine-tuning (SFT) followed by direct preference optimization (DPO).

Why it matters for eval

  • On audio understanding and reasoning benchmarks, large audio-language models (LALMs) are limited primarily by perceptual errors, yet existing post-training datasets rely on audio descriptions of limited diversity.
  • Using LLT, we synthesize 1.6M reasoning traces and train Qwen2.5-Omni-7B with a two-stage pipeline of supervised fine-tuning (SFT) followed by direct preference optimization (DPO).

Researcher checklist

  • Human feedback protocol is explicit

    Detected: Pairwise Preference

  • Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Automatic Metrics

  • Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Metric reporting is present

    Detected: accuracy