Skip to content
← Back to explorer

From Oracle to Noisy Context: Mitigating Contextual Exposure Bias in Speech-LLMs

Xiaoyong Guo, Nanjie Li, Zijie Zeng, Kai Wang, Hao Huang, Haihua Xu, Wei Shi · Mar 25, 2026 · Citations: 0

Coding Pairwise Preference
Open arXiv Find Implementation RSS feed Shortlist (0)

How to use this page

Moderate trust

Use this for comparison and orientation, not as your only source.

Best use

Secondary protocol comparison source

What to verify

Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.

Evidence quality

Moderate

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

Contextual automatic speech recognition (ASR) with Speech-LLMs is typically trained with oracle conversation history, but relies on error-prone history at inference, causing a train-test mismatch in the context channel that we term contextual exposure bias. We propose a unified training framework to improve robustness under realistic histories: (i) Teacher Error Knowledge by using Whisper large-v3 hypotheses as training-time history, (ii) Context Dropout to regularize over-reliance on history, and (iii) Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) on curated failure cases. Experiments on TED-LIUM 3 (in-domain) and zero-shot LibriSpeech (out-of-domain) show consistent gains under predicted-history decoding. With a two-utterance history as context, SFT with Whisper hypotheses reduce WER from 5.59% (oracle-history training) to 5.47%, and DPO further improves to 5.17%. Under irrelevant-context attacks, DPO yields the smallest degradation (5.17% -> 5.63%), indicating improved robustness to misleading context. Our code and models are published on https://github.com/XYGuo1996/Contextual_Speech_LLMs.

Low-signal caution for protocol decisions

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • The abstract does not clearly describe the evaluation setup.
Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper has useful evaluation signal, but protocol completeness is partial; pair it with related papers before deciding implementation strategy.

Best use

Secondary protocol comparison source

Use if you need

Background context only.

Main weakness

The abstract does not clearly describe the evaluation setup.

Trust level

Moderate

Usefulness score

50/100 • Medium

Useful as a secondary reference; validate protocol details against neighboring papers.

Human Feedback Signal

Detected

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

Usefulness for eval research

Moderate-confidence candidate

Extraction confidence 50%

If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here:

Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub Tool-Use Eval Hub

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

strong

Pairwise Preference

Directly usable for protocol triage.

"Contextual automatic speech recognition (ASR) with Speech-LLMs is typically trained with oracle conversation history, but relies on error-prone history at inference, causing a train-test mismatch in the context channel that we term contextual exposure bias."

Evaluation Modes

missing

None explicit

Validate eval design from full paper text.

"Contextual automatic speech recognition (ASR) with Speech-LLMs is typically trained with oracle conversation history, but relies on error-prone history at inference, causing a train-test mismatch in the context channel that we term contextual exposure bias."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Contextual automatic speech recognition (ASR) with Speech-LLMs is typically trained with oracle conversation history, but relies on error-prone history at inference, causing a train-test mismatch in the context channel that we term contextual exposure bias."

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Contextual automatic speech recognition (ASR) with Speech-LLMs is typically trained with oracle conversation history, but relies on error-prone history at inference, causing a train-test mismatch in the context channel that we term contextual exposure bias."

Reported Metrics

strong

Wer, Jailbreak success rate

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"With a two-utterance history as context, SFT with Whisper hypotheses reduce WER from 5.59% (oracle-history training) to 5.47%, and DPO further improves to 5.17%."

Human Feedback Details

  • Uses human feedback: Yes
  • Feedback types: Pairwise Preference
  • Rater population: Not reported
  • Expertise required: Coding

Evaluation Details

  • Evaluation modes:
  • Agentic eval: None
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Evidence quality: Moderate
  • Use this page as: Secondary protocol comparison source

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported Metrics

werjailbreak success rate

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Contextual automatic speech recognition (ASR) with Speech-LLMs is typically trained with oracle conversation history, but relies on error-prone history at inference, causing a train-test mismatch in the context channel that we term contextual exposure bias.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Contextual automatic speech recognition (ASR) with Speech-LLMs is typically trained with oracle conversation history, but relies on error-prone history at inference, causing a train-test mismatch in the context channel that we term contextual exposure bias.
  • We propose a unified training framework to improve robustness under realistic histories: (i) Teacher Error Knowledge by using Whisper large-v3 hypotheses as training-time history, (ii) Context Dropout to regularize over-reliance on history, and (iii) Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) on curated failure cases.
  • Experiments on TED-LIUM 3 (in-domain) and zero-shot LibriSpeech (out-of-domain) show consistent gains under predicted-history decoding.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • We propose a unified training framework to improve robustness under realistic histories: (i) Teacher Error Knowledge by using Whisper large-v3 hypotheses as training-time history, (ii) Context Dropout to regularize over-reliance on history,…
  • With a two-utterance history as context, SFT with Whisper hypotheses reduce WER from 5.59% (oracle-history training) to 5.47%, and DPO further improves to 5.17%.
  • Under irrelevant-context attacks, DPO yields the smallest degradation (5.17% -> 5.63%), indicating improved robustness to misleading context.

Why It Matters For Eval

  • We propose a unified training framework to improve robustness under realistic histories: (i) Teacher Error Knowledge by using Whisper large-v3 hypotheses as training-time history, (ii) Context Dropout to regularize over-reliance on history,…

Researcher Checklist

  • Pass: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    Detected: Pairwise Preference

  • Gap: Evaluation mode is explicit

    No clear evaluation mode extracted.

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Gap: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Pass: Metric reporting is present

    Detected: wer, jailbreak success rate

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Create Account & Post a Job
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
Learn About Managed Service
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.
Join Now