CV-18 NER: Augmented Common Voice for Named Entity Recognition from Arabic Speech

Youssef Saidi, Haroun Elleuch, Fethi Bougares · Apr 2, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics

Open arXiv Find Implementation RSS feed Shortlist (0)

How to use this page

Low trust

Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.

Evidence quality

Low

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

End-to-end speech Named Entity Recognition (NER) aims to directly extract entities from speech. Prior work has shown that end-to-end (E2E) approaches can outperform cascaded pipelines for English, French, and Chinese, but Arabic remains under-explored due to its morphological complexity, the absence of short vowels, and limited annotated resources. We introduce CV-18 NER, the first publicly available dataset for NER from Arabic speech, created by augmenting the Arabic Common Voice 18 corpus with manual NER annotations following the fine-grained Wojood schema (21 entity types). We benchmark both pipeline systems (ASR + text NER) and E2E models based on Whisper and AraBEST-RQ. E2E systems substantially outperform the best pipeline configuration on the test set, reaching 37.0% CoER (AraBEST-RQ 300M) and 38.0% CVER (Whisper-medium). Further analysis shows that Arabic-specific self-supervised pretraining yields strong ASR performance, while multilingual weak supervision transfers more effectively to joint speech-to-entity learning, and that larger models may be harder to adapt in this low-resource setting. Our dataset and models are publicly released, providing the first open benchmark for end-to-end named entity recognition from Arabic speech https://huggingface.co/datasets/Elyadata/CV18-NER.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.

Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

Main weakness

This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.

Trust level

Low

Usefulness score

0/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Detected

Usefulness for eval research

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence 35%

If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here:

Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub Tool-Use Eval Hub

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.