Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Mitigating Unintended Memorization with LoRA in Federated Learning for LLMs

Thierry Bossy, Julien Vignoud, Tahseen Rabbani, Juan R. Troncoso Pastoriza, Martin Jaggi · Feb 7, 2025 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Provisional trust

This page is a lightweight research summary built from the abstract and metadata while deeper extraction catches up.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Provisional

Derived from abstract and metadata only.

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) is a popular paradigm for collaborative training which avoids direct data exposure between clients. However, data privacy issues still remain: FL-trained large language models are capable of memorizing and completing phrases and sentences contained in training data when given their prefixes. Thus, it is possible for adversarial and honest- but-curious clients to recover training data of other participants simply through targeted prompting. In this work, we demonstrate that a popular and simple fine-tuning strategy, low-rank adaptation (LoRA), reduces memorization during FL by a factor of up to 10 without significant performance cost. We study this effect by performing fine-tuning tasks in high-risk domains such as medicine, law, and finance. We observe a reduction in memorization for a wide variety of model families, from 1B to 70B parameters. We find that LoRA can reduce memorization in centralized learning as well, and we compare how the memorization patterns differ. Furthermore, we study the effect of hyperparameters and show that LoRA can be combined with other privacy-preserving techniques such as gradient clipping and Gaussian noise, secure aggregation, and Goldfish loss to further improve record-level privacy while maintaining performance.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

  • This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Trust level

Provisional

Usefulness score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

Usefulness for eval research

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence 0%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

provisional (inferred)

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Federated learning (FL) is a popular paradigm for collaborative training which avoids direct data exposure between clients."

Evaluation Modes

provisional (inferred)

None explicit

Validate eval design from full paper text.

"Federated learning (FL) is a popular paradigm for collaborative training which avoids direct data exposure between clients."

Quality Controls

provisional (inferred)

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Federated learning (FL) is a popular paradigm for collaborative training which avoids direct data exposure between clients."

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Federated learning (FL) is a popular paradigm for collaborative training which avoids direct data exposure between clients."

Reported Metrics

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No metric anchors detected.

"Federated learning (FL) is a popular paradigm for collaborative training which avoids direct data exposure between clients."

Rater Population

provisional (inferred)

Unknown

Rater source not explicitly reported.

"Federated learning (FL) is a popular paradigm for collaborative training which avoids direct data exposure between clients."

Human Feedback Details

This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Details

Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.

  • Potential evaluation modes: No explicit eval keywords detected.
  • Potential metric signals: No metric keywords detected.
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Federated learning (FL) is a popular paradigm for collaborative training which avoids direct data exposure between clients.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Federated learning (FL) is a popular paradigm for collaborative training which avoids direct data exposure between clients.
  • However, data privacy issues still remain: FL-trained large language models are capable of memorizing and completing phrases and sentences contained in training data when given their prefixes.
  • Thus, it is possible for adversarial and honest- but-curious clients to recover training data of other participants simply through targeted prompting.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Check the full text for explicit evaluation design choices (raters, protocol, and metrics).
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.