Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
LoRA
MMLU
Accuracy
0.308
Split: Average
Source: paper fulltext
LoRA
Llama 3.2 1B
Accuracy per round.
0.425
Source: paper fulltext
LoRA
LoRA
Accuracy per round.
0.422
Source: paper fulltext
LoRA
0.430
Accuracy per round.
0.434
Source: paper fulltext
LoRA
Llama 3.1 70B
BLEU
0.55
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

6 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
LoRA MMLU Accuracy 0.308 paper-derived No explicit refs
LoRA Llama 3.2 1B Accuracy per round. 0.425 paper-derived No explicit refs
LoRA LoRA Accuracy per round. 0.422 paper-derived No explicit refs
LoRA 0.430 Accuracy per round. 0.434 paper-derived No explicit refs
LoRA Llama 3.1 70B BLEU 0.55 paper-derived No explicit refs
LoRA Llama 3.2 3B BLEU 0.29 paper-derived No explicit refs

Federated learning (FL) is a popular paradigm for collaborative training which avoids direct data exposure between clients.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: low

Only historical official repository was found (tuneinsight/federated-llms).

Open tuneinsight/federated-llms

Reproduction Risks

  • Only historical official implementation is available
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.

Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 1 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

tuneinsight/federated-llms
historical official
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
13
Last push
Apr 1, 2025 (380d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

Only a historical official implementation is available.

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

tuneinsight/federated-llms
Historical official
Stars: 13
Last push: Apr 1, 2025
  • Only historical official repository was found: tuneinsight/federated-llms.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Apr 8, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · tuneinsight/federated-llms has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 380 days ago.
Open tuneinsight/federated-llms

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Research context

Tasks

LoRA

Methods

LoRA / Parameter-efficient tuning

Domains

Natural Language Processing

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.