Human Feedback Types
missingNone explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"We introduce Full-Duplex-Bench-v3 (FDB-v3), a benchmark for evaluating spoken language models under naturalistic speech conditions and multi-step tool use."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Guan-Ting Lin, Chen Chen, Zhehuai Chen, Hung-yi Lee
Published
Apr 6, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Moderate
Usefulness score
25/100 (Low)
Extraction confidence
55% (Moderate)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Apr 6, 2026
This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.
Use this for comparison and orientation, not as your only source.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A benchmark-and-metrics comparison anchor.
What to verify
Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.
Main weakness
No major weakness surfaced.
Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
We introduce Full-Duplex-Bench-v3 (FDB-v3), a benchmark for evaluating spoken language models under naturalistic speech conditions and multi-step tool use. Unlike prior work, our dataset consists entirely of real human audio annotated for five disfluency categories, paired with scenarios requiring chained API calls across four task domains. We evaluate six model configurations -- GPT-Realtime, Gemini Live 2.5, Gemini Live 3.1, Grok, Ultravox v0.7, and a traditional Cascaded pipeline (Whisper$\rightarrow$GPT-4o$\rightarrow$TTS) -- across accuracy, latency, and turn-taking dimensions. GPT-Realtime leads on Pass@1 (0.600) and interruption avoidance (13.5\%); Gemini Live 3.1 achieves the fastest latency (4.25~s) but the lowest turn-take rate (78.0\%); and the Cascaded baseline, despite a perfect turn-take rate, incurs the highest latency (10.12~s). Across all systems, self-correction handling and multi-step reasoning under hard scenarios remain the most consistent failure modes.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"We introduce Full-Duplex-Bench-v3 (FDB-v3), a benchmark for evaluating spoken language models under naturalistic speech conditions and multi-step tool use."
Automatic Metrics
Includes extracted eval setup.
"We introduce Full-Duplex-Bench-v3 (FDB-v3), a benchmark for evaluating spoken language models under naturalistic speech conditions and multi-step tool use."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"We introduce Full-Duplex-Bench-v3 (FDB-v3), a benchmark for evaluating spoken language models under naturalistic speech conditions and multi-step tool use."
Full Duplex Bench
Useful for quick benchmark comparison.
"We introduce Full-Duplex-Bench-v3 (FDB-v3), a benchmark for evaluating spoken language models under naturalistic speech conditions and multi-step tool use."
Accuracy, Pass@1
Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.
"We evaluate six model configurations -- GPT-Realtime, Gemini Live 2.5, Gemini Live 3.1, Grok, Ultravox v0.7, and a traditional Cascaded pipeline (Whisper$\rightarrow$GPT-4o$\rightarrow$TTS) -- across accuracy, latency, and turn-taking dimensions."
We introduce Full-Duplex-Bench-v3 (FDB-v3), a benchmark for evaluating spoken language models under naturalistic speech conditions and multi-step tool use.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
No explicit human feedback protocol detected.
Evaluation mode is explicit
Detected: Automatic Metrics
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
Detected: full-duplex-bench
Metric reporting is present
Detected: accuracy, pass@1