Human Feedback Types
missingNone explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Existing GNN quantization methods suffer from considerable quantization overhead, which severely limits their practical usage in real-world scenarios."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Dain Kwon, Kanghyun Choi, Hyeyoon Lee, Sunjong Park +3 more
Published
Aug 31, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Low
Usefulness score
0/100 (Low)
Extraction confidence
35% (Low)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Aug 31, 2026
This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.
Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.
All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.
What to verify
Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.
Main weakness
This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Existing GNN quantization methods suffer from considerable quantization overhead, which severely limits their practical usage in real-world scenarios. To this end, we present TopGQ, an accurate post-training GNN quantization framework, alleviating redundant quantization overhead. We propose dual-axis scale absorption, which enables activation quantization along both the outer and inner dimensions by merging one into the adjacency matrix. On top of that, we introduce TopPIN, a proxy for nodes' local structure, and use it to group nodes with similar topology during quantization. Experimental results show that TopGQ reduces quantization time by an order of magnitude while preserving accuracy.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Existing GNN quantization methods suffer from considerable quantization overhead, which severely limits their practical usage in real-world scenarios."
Automatic Metrics
Includes extracted eval setup.
"Existing GNN quantization methods suffer from considerable quantization overhead, which severely limits their practical usage in real-world scenarios."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Existing GNN quantization methods suffer from considerable quantization overhead, which severely limits their practical usage in real-world scenarios."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"Existing GNN quantization methods suffer from considerable quantization overhead, which severely limits their practical usage in real-world scenarios."
Accuracy
Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.
"Experimental results show that TopGQ reduces quantization time by an order of magnitude while preserving accuracy."
No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.
Existing GNN quantization methods suffer from considerable quantization overhead, which severely limits their practical usage in real-world scenarios.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
No explicit human feedback protocol detected.
Evaluation mode is explicit
Detected: Automatic Metrics
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.
Metric reporting is present
Detected: accuracy