Human Feedback Types
missingNone explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Multi-agent systems provide a convenient framework for the massive deployment of agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs)."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Vicenç Torra, Maria Bras-Amorós
Published
Nov 10, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Low
Usefulness score
0/100 (Low)
Extraction confidence
15% (Low)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Nov 10, 2026
This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.
Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.
All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.
What to verify
Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.
Main weakness
This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Multi-agent systems provide a convenient framework for the massive deployment of agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs). It provides a sound framework where agents can interact with existing software to perform actions in an autonomous way. Agentic AI is the new term to denote these AI-based autonomous systems. In real multi-agent systems, agents need to deal with malicious agents some of which can exploit security vulnerabilities to do harm. A memory poisoning attack is an example of exploiting a vulnerability to modify agents knowledge and, thus, affect its behavior. In an agent, there are different types of memory systems (semantic, episodic, and short-term) which have their own characteristics and for which different memory poisoning attacks may be developed. In this paper we focus on semantic memory, we discuss its attack, and mitigation strategies. We introduce private knowledge retrieval and private inference. We propose a signature system in the knowledge base to prevent from undesired manipulation. This should avoid memory poisoning attacks by introducing security by design in the construction of the semantic memory. In our architecture, an agent contains a local Prolog-like inference system (i.e., using Horn clauses to represent knowledge) which accesses an external knowledge base to get the required knowledge. This externally signed knowledge base is accessed privately. We provide different implementations in Python using different privacy levels including k-anonymity and information-theoretical privacy (IT-PIR).
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Multi-agent systems provide a convenient framework for the massive deployment of agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs)."
None explicit
Validate eval design from full paper text.
"Multi-agent systems provide a convenient framework for the massive deployment of agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs)."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Multi-agent systems provide a convenient framework for the massive deployment of agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs)."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"Multi-agent systems provide a convenient framework for the massive deployment of agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs)."
Not extracted
No metric anchors detected.
"Multi-agent systems provide a convenient framework for the massive deployment of agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs)."
No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.
No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.
Multi-agent systems provide a convenient framework for the massive deployment of agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs).
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
No explicit human feedback protocol detected.
Evaluation mode is explicit
No clear evaluation mode extracted.
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.
Metric reporting is present
No metric terms extracted.