Human Feedback Types
missingNone explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Accessing sensitive patient data for machine learning is challenging due to privacy concerns."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Ibrahim Baroud, Christoph Otto, Vera Czehmann, Christine Hovhannisyan +3 more
Published
Mar 9, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Low
Usefulness score
0/100 (Low)
Extraction confidence
25% (Low)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Mar 14, 2026
This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.
Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.
All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
Background context only.
What to verify
Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.
Main weakness
This paper looks adjacent to evaluation work, but not like a strong protocol reference.
Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Accessing sensitive patient data for machine learning is challenging due to privacy concerns. Datasets with annotations of personally identifiable information are crucial for developing and testing anonymization systems to enable safe data sharing that complies with privacy regulations. Since accessing real patient data is a bottleneck, synthetic data offers an efficient solution for data scarcity, bypassing privacy regulations that apply to real data. Moreover, neural machine translation can help to create high-quality data for low-resource languages by translating validated real or synthetic data from a high-resource language. In this work, we create a multilingual anonymization benchmark in ten languages, using a machine translation methodology that preserves the original annotations and renders names of cities and people in a culturally and contextually appropriate form in each target language. Our evaluation study with medical professionals confirms the quality of the translations, both in general and with respect to the translation and adaptation of personal information. Our benchmark with over 2,500 annotations of personal information can be used in many applications, including training annotators, validating annotations across institutions without legal complications, and helping improve the performance of automatic personal information detection. We make our benchmark and annotation guidelines available for further research.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Accessing sensitive patient data for machine learning is challenging due to privacy concerns."
None explicit
Validate eval design from full paper text.
"Accessing sensitive patient data for machine learning is challenging due to privacy concerns."
Calibration
Calibration/adjudication style controls detected.
"Accessing sensitive patient data for machine learning is challenging due to privacy concerns."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"Accessing sensitive patient data for machine learning is challenging due to privacy concerns."
Not extracted
No metric anchors detected.
"Accessing sensitive patient data for machine learning is challenging due to privacy concerns."
No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.
No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.
Accessing sensitive patient data for machine learning is challenging due to privacy concerns.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
No explicit human feedback protocol detected.
Evaluation mode is explicit
No clear evaluation mode extracted.
Quality control reporting appears
Detected: Calibration
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.
Metric reporting is present
No metric terms extracted.