Skip to content
← Back to explorer

NERO-Net: A Neuroevolutionary Approach for the Design of Adversarially Robust CNNs

Inês Valentim, Nuno Antunes, Nuno Lourenço · Mar 26, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Provisional trust

This page is a lightweight research summary built from the abstract and metadata while deeper extraction catches up.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Provisional

Derived from abstract and metadata only.

Abstract

Neuroevolution automates the complex task of neural network design but often ignores the inherent adversarial fragility of evolved models which is a barrier to adoption in safety-critical scenarios. While robust training methods have received significant attention, the design of architectures exhibiting intrinsic robustness remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we propose NERO-Net, a neuroevolutionary approach to design convolutional neural networks better equipped to resist adversarial attacks. Our search strategy isolates architectural influence on robustness by avoiding adversarial training during the evolutionary loop. As such, our fitness function promotes candidates that, even trained with standard (non-robust) methods, achieve high post-attack accuracy without sacrificing the accuracy on clean samples. We assess NERO-Net on CIFAR-10 with a specific focus on $L_\infty$-robustness. In particular, the fittest individual emerged from evolutionary search with 33% accuracy against FGSM, used as an efficient estimator for robustness during the search phase, while maintaining 87% clean accuracy. Further standard training of this individual boosted these metrics to 47% adversarial and 93% clean accuracy, suggesting inherent architectural robustness. Adversarial training brings the overall accuracy of the model up to 40% against AutoAttack.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

  • This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Trust level

Provisional

Usefulness score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

Usefulness for eval research

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence 0%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

provisional (inferred)

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Neuroevolution automates the complex task of neural network design but often ignores the inherent adversarial fragility of evolved models which is a barrier to adoption in safety-critical scenarios."

Evaluation Modes

provisional (inferred)

Automatic metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"Neuroevolution automates the complex task of neural network design but often ignores the inherent adversarial fragility of evolved models which is a barrier to adoption in safety-critical scenarios."

Quality Controls

provisional (inferred)

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Neuroevolution automates the complex task of neural network design but often ignores the inherent adversarial fragility of evolved models which is a barrier to adoption in safety-critical scenarios."

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Neuroevolution automates the complex task of neural network design but often ignores the inherent adversarial fragility of evolved models which is a barrier to adoption in safety-critical scenarios."

Reported Metrics

provisional (inferred)

Accuracy

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"As such, our fitness function promotes candidates that, even trained with standard (non-robust) methods, achieve high post-attack accuracy without sacrificing the accuracy on clean samples."

Rater Population

provisional (inferred)

Unknown

Rater source not explicitly reported.

"Neuroevolution automates the complex task of neural network design but often ignores the inherent adversarial fragility of evolved models which is a barrier to adoption in safety-critical scenarios."

Human Feedback Details

This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Details

Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.

  • Potential evaluation modes: Automatic metrics
  • Potential metric signals: Accuracy
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Neuroevolution automates the complex task of neural network design but often ignores the inherent adversarial fragility of evolved models which is a barrier to adoption in safety-critical scenarios.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Neuroevolution automates the complex task of neural network design but often ignores the inherent adversarial fragility of evolved models which is a barrier to adoption in safety-critical scenarios.
  • While robust training methods have received significant attention, the design of architectures exhibiting intrinsic robustness remains largely unexplored.
  • In this paper, we propose NERO-Net, a neuroevolutionary approach to design convolutional neural networks better equipped to resist adversarial attacks.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Automatic metrics) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.