Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Human-AI Co-reasoning for Clinical Diagnosis with Evidence-Integrated Language Agent

Zhongzhen Huang, Yan Ling, Hong Chen, Ye Feng, Li Wu, Linjie Mu, Shaoting Zhang, Xiaofan Zhang, Kun Qian, Xiaomu Li · Mar 11, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Moderate trust

Use this for comparison and orientation, not as your only source.

Best use

Secondary protocol comparison source

What to verify

Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.

Evidence quality

Moderate

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

We present PULSE, a medical reasoning agent that combines a domain-tuned large language model with scientific literature retrieval to support diagnostic decision-making in complex real-world cases. To evaluate its capabilities, we curated a benchmark of 82 authentic endocrinology case reports encompassing a broad spectrum of disease types and incidence levels. In controlled experiments, we compared PULSE's performance against physicians with varying levels of expertise-from residents to senior specialists-and examined how AI assistance influenced human diagnostic reasoning. PULSE attained expert-competitive accuracy, outperforming residents and junior specialists while matching senior specialist performance at both Top@1 and Top@4 thresholds. Unlike physicians, whose accuracy declined with disease rarity, PULSE maintained stable performance across incidence tiers. The agent also exhibited adaptive reasoning, increasing output length with case difficulty in a manner analogous to the longer deliberation observed among expert clinicians. When used collaboratively, PULSE enabled physicians to correct initial errors and broaden diagnostic hypotheses, but also introduced risks of automation bias. The study explores both serial and concurrent collaboration workflows, revealing that PULSE offers robust support across common and rare presentations. These findings underscore both the promise and the limitations of language model-based agents in clinical diagnosis, and offer a framework for evaluating their role in real-world decision-making.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper has useful evaluation signal, but protocol completeness is partial; pair it with related papers before deciding implementation strategy.

Best use

Secondary protocol comparison source

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

Main weakness

No major weakness surfaced.

Trust level

Moderate

Usefulness score

65/100 • Medium

Useful as a secondary reference; validate protocol details against neighboring papers.

Human Feedback Signal

Detected

Evaluation Signal

Detected

Usefulness for eval research

Moderate-confidence candidate

Extraction confidence 70%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

strong

Expert Verification

Directly usable for protocol triage.

"We present PULSE, a medical reasoning agent that combines a domain-tuned large language model with scientific literature retrieval to support diagnostic decision-making in complex real-world cases."

Evaluation Modes

strong

Automatic Metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"We present PULSE, a medical reasoning agent that combines a domain-tuned large language model with scientific literature retrieval to support diagnostic decision-making in complex real-world cases."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"We present PULSE, a medical reasoning agent that combines a domain-tuned large language model with scientific literature retrieval to support diagnostic decision-making in complex real-world cases."

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"We present PULSE, a medical reasoning agent that combines a domain-tuned large language model with scientific literature retrieval to support diagnostic decision-making in complex real-world cases."

Reported Metrics

strong

Accuracy

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"PULSE attained expert-competitive accuracy, outperforming residents and junior specialists while matching senior specialist performance at both Top@1 and Top@4 thresholds."

Rater Population

strong

Domain Experts

Helpful for staffing comparability.

"In controlled experiments, we compared PULSE's performance against physicians with varying levels of expertise-from residents to senior specialists-and examined how AI assistance influenced human diagnostic reasoning."

Human Feedback Details

  • Uses human feedback: Yes
  • Feedback types: Expert Verification
  • Rater population: Domain Experts
  • Expertise required: Medicine

Evaluation Details

  • Evaluation modes: Automatic Metrics
  • Agentic eval: None
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Evidence quality: Moderate
  • Use this page as: Secondary protocol comparison source

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported Metrics

accuracy

Research Brief

Metadata summary

We present PULSE, a medical reasoning agent that combines a domain-tuned large language model with scientific literature retrieval to support diagnostic decision-making in complex real-world cases.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • We present PULSE, a medical reasoning agent that combines a domain-tuned large language model with scientific literature retrieval to support diagnostic decision-making in complex real-world cases.
  • To evaluate its capabilities, we curated a benchmark of 82 authentic endocrinology case reports encompassing a broad spectrum of disease types and incidence levels.
  • In controlled experiments, we compared PULSE's performance against physicians with varying levels of expertise-from residents to senior specialists-and examined how AI assistance influenced human diagnostic reasoning.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Automatic metrics) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • We present PULSE, a medical reasoning agent that combines a domain-tuned large language model with scientific literature retrieval to support diagnostic decision-making in complex real-world cases.
  • To evaluate its capabilities, we curated a benchmark of 82 authentic endocrinology case reports encompassing a broad spectrum of disease types and incidence levels.
  • In controlled experiments, we compared PULSE's performance against physicians with varying levels of expertise-from residents to senior specialists-and examined how AI assistance influenced human diagnostic reasoning.

Why It Matters For Eval

  • We present PULSE, a medical reasoning agent that combines a domain-tuned large language model with scientific literature retrieval to support diagnostic decision-making in complex real-world cases.
  • To evaluate its capabilities, we curated a benchmark of 82 authentic endocrinology case reports encompassing a broad spectrum of disease types and incidence levels.

Researcher Checklist

  • Pass: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    Detected: Expert Verification

  • Pass: Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Automatic Metrics

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Gap: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Pass: Metric reporting is present

    Detected: accuracy

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.