Human Feedback Types
partialDemonstrations
Directly usable for protocol triage.
"Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering (TKGQA) is challenging because it requires multi-hop reasoning under complex temporal constraints."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Xufei Lv, Jiahui Yang, Haoyuan Sun, Xialin Su +4 more
Published
Mar 2, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Low
Usefulness score
40/100 (Low)
Extraction confidence
45% (Low)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Mar 25, 2026
This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.
Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.
Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
Background context only.
What to verify
Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.
Main weakness
The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.
Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering (TKGQA) is challenging because it requires multi-hop reasoning under complex temporal constraints. Recent LLM-based approaches have improved semantic modeling for this task, but many still rely on fixed reasoning workflows or costly post-training, which can limit adaptability and make error recovery difficult. We show that enabling an off-the-shelf Large Language Model (LLM) to determine its next action is already effective in a zero-shot setting. Based on this insight, we propose AT2QA, an Autonomous and Training-free Agent for TKG Question Answering. AT2QA empowers the LLM to iteratively interact with the TKG via a generic search tool, inherently enabling autonomous exploration and dynamic self-correction during reasoning. To further elicit the LLM's potential for complex temporal reasoning, we introduce a training-free experience mining mechanism that distills a compact few-shot demonstration library from successful self-generated trajectories. AT2QA also yields a transparent audit trail for every prediction. Experiments on three challenging benchmarks -- MultiTQ, Timeline-CronQuestion, and Timeline-ICEWS-Actor -- show that AT2QA achieves new state-of-the-art performance, surpassing the strongest baselines by 10.7, 4.9, and 11.2 absolute points, respectively. Our code is available at https://github.com/AT2QA-Official-Code/AT2QA-Official-Code
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
Demonstrations
Directly usable for protocol triage.
"Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering (TKGQA) is challenging because it requires multi-hop reasoning under complex temporal constraints."
None explicit
Validate eval design from full paper text.
"Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering (TKGQA) is challenging because it requires multi-hop reasoning under complex temporal constraints."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering (TKGQA) is challenging because it requires multi-hop reasoning under complex temporal constraints."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering (TKGQA) is challenging because it requires multi-hop reasoning under complex temporal constraints."
Not extracted
No metric anchors detected.
"Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering (TKGQA) is challenging because it requires multi-hop reasoning under complex temporal constraints."
No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.
No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.
Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering (TKGQA) is challenging because it requires multi-hop reasoning under complex temporal constraints.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
Detected: Demonstrations
Evaluation mode is explicit
No clear evaluation mode extracted.
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.
Metric reporting is present
No metric terms extracted.