Skip to content
← Back to explorer

AgenticRec: End-to-End Tool-Integrated Policy Optimization for Ranking-Oriented Recommender Agents

Tianyi Li, Zixuan Wang, Guidong Lei, Xiaodong Li, Hui Li · Mar 23, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Moderate trust

Use this for comparison and orientation, not as your only source.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Moderate

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

Recommender agents built on Large Language Models offer a promising paradigm for recommendation. However, existing recommender agents typically suffer from a disconnect between intermediate reasoning and final ranking feedback, and are unable to capture fine-grained preferences. To address this, we present AgenticRec, a ranking-oriented agentic recommendation framework that optimizes the entire decision-making trajectory (including intermediate reasoning, tool invocation, and final ranking list generation) under sparse implicit feedback. Our approach makes three key contributions. First, we design a suite of recommendation-specific tools integrated into a ReAct loop to support evidence-grounded reasoning. Second, we propose theoretically unbiased List-Wise Group Relative Policy Optimization (list-wise GRPO) to maximize ranking utility, ensuring accurate credit assignment for complex tool-use trajectories. Third, we introduce Progressive Preference Refinement (PPR) to resolve fine-grained preference ambiguities. By mining hard negatives from ranking violations and applying bidirectional preference alignment, PPR minimizes the convex upper bound of pairwise ranking errors. Experiments on benchmarks confirm that AgenticRec significantly outperforms baselines, validating the necessity of unifying reasoning, tool use, and ranking optimization.

Low-signal caution for protocol decisions

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • The abstract does not clearly name benchmarks or metrics.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

Main weakness

The abstract does not clearly name benchmarks or metrics.

Trust level

Moderate

Usefulness score

40/100 • Low

Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.

Human Feedback Signal

Detected

Evaluation Signal

Detected

Usefulness for eval research

Adjacent candidate

Extraction confidence 50%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

strong

Pairwise Preference

Directly usable for protocol triage.

"Recommender agents built on Large Language Models offer a promising paradigm for recommendation."

Evaluation Modes

missing

None explicit

Validate eval design from full paper text.

"Recommender agents built on Large Language Models offer a promising paradigm for recommendation."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Recommender agents built on Large Language Models offer a promising paradigm for recommendation."

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Recommender agents built on Large Language Models offer a promising paradigm for recommendation."

Reported Metrics

missing

Not extracted

No metric anchors detected.

"Recommender agents built on Large Language Models offer a promising paradigm for recommendation."

Human Feedback Details

  • Uses human feedback: Yes
  • Feedback types: Pairwise Preference
  • Rater population: Not reported
  • Unit of annotation: Pairwise
  • Expertise required: General

Evaluation Details

  • Evaluation modes:
  • Agentic eval: Tool Use, Long Horizon
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Evidence quality: Moderate
  • Use this page as: Background context only

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported Metrics

No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Recommender agents built on Large Language Models offer a promising paradigm for recommendation.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Recommender agents built on Large Language Models offer a promising paradigm for recommendation.
  • However, existing recommender agents typically suffer from a disconnect between intermediate reasoning and final ranking feedback, and are unable to capture fine-grained preferences.
  • To address this, we present AgenticRec, a ranking-oriented agentic recommendation framework that optimizes the entire decision-making trajectory (including intermediate reasoning, tool invocation, and final ranking list generation) under sparse implicit feedback.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Tool-use evaluation) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • To address this, we present AgenticRec, a ranking-oriented agentic recommendation framework that optimizes the entire decision-making trajectory (including intermediate reasoning, tool invocation, and final ranking list generation) under…
  • Second, we propose theoretically unbiased List-Wise Group Relative Policy Optimization (list-wise GRPO) to maximize ranking utility, ensuring accurate credit assignment for complex tool-use trajectories.
  • Third, we introduce Progressive Preference Refinement (PPR) to resolve fine-grained preference ambiguities.

Why It Matters For Eval

  • To address this, we present AgenticRec, a ranking-oriented agentic recommendation framework that optimizes the entire decision-making trajectory (including intermediate reasoning, tool invocation, and final ranking list generation) under…
  • Third, we introduce Progressive Preference Refinement (PPR) to resolve fine-grained preference ambiguities.

Researcher Checklist

  • Pass: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    Detected: Pairwise Preference

  • Gap: Evaluation mode is explicit

    No clear evaluation mode extracted.

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Gap: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Gap: Metric reporting is present

    No metric terms extracted.

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.