Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Scene Abstraction for Lexical Semantics: Structured Representations of Situated Meaning

Yejin Cho, Katrin Erk · May 21, 2026 · Citations: 0

Automatic Metrics General Pairwise Preference
Open arXiv Find Implementation RSS feed Shortlist (0)

How to use this page

Moderate trust

Use this for comparison and orientation, not as your only source.

Best use

Secondary protocol comparison source

What to verify

Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.

Evidence quality

Moderate

Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.

Abstract

Coffee and tea share many properties, yet they evoke strikingly different situations, atmospheres, and affective associations. These situated dimensions of word meaning are real and systematic, but they remain implicit in most computational representations of lexical meaning. We propose Scene Abstraction, a framework for constructing structured representations of the interpretive scenes that words participate in across usage contexts. Each scene consists of a Contextual Scene (Events, Entities, Setting) and an expression-centered Expression Profile (Engaged events, Generalizable properties, Evoked emotions), operationalized through few-shot prompting of a large language model. Our contributions are three-fold: (1) a structured representation framework for situated lexical meaning; (2) COCA-Scenes, a dataset of 520 usage instances across 26 keywords for distinct scene identification; and (3) empirical evidence from two experiments suggesting that scenes are reliably identifiable across human observers (82.4% accuracy, +11.8 pp over text-only embeddings) and that our scene profiles more closely align with human interpretation of words in context than ATOMIC-based alternatives (86.4% preference across three semantic dimensions).

Should You Rely On This Paper?

This paper has useful evaluation signal, but protocol completeness is partial; pair it with related papers before deciding implementation strategy.

Best use

Secondary protocol comparison source

Use if you need

A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.

Main weakness

No major weakness surfaced.

Trust level

Moderate

Usefulness score

65/100 • Medium

Useful as a secondary reference; validate protocol details against neighboring papers.

Human Feedback Signal

Detected

Evaluation Signal

Detected

Usefulness for eval research

Moderate-confidence candidate

Extraction confidence 70%

If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here:

Human Eval Hub LLM-as-Judge Hub Pairwise Preference Hub Tool-Use Eval Hub

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

strong

Pairwise Preference

Directly usable for protocol triage.

"Coffee and tea share many properties, yet they evoke strikingly different situations, atmospheres, and affective associations."

Evaluation Modes

strong

Automatic Metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"Coffee and tea share many properties, yet they evoke strikingly different situations, atmospheres, and affective associations."

Quality Controls

missing

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Coffee and tea share many properties, yet they evoke strikingly different situations, atmospheres, and affective associations."

Benchmarks / Datasets

missing

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Coffee and tea share many properties, yet they evoke strikingly different situations, atmospheres, and affective associations."

Reported Metrics

strong

Accuracy

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"Our contributions are three-fold: (1) a structured representation framework for situated lexical meaning; (2) COCA-Scenes, a dataset of 520 usage instances across 26 keywords for distinct scene identification; and (3) empirical evidence from two experiments suggesting that scenes are reliably identifiable across human observers (82.4% accuracy, +11.8 pp over text-only embeddings) and that our scene profiles more closely align with human interpretation of words in context than ATOMIC-based alternatives (86.4% preference across three semantic dimensions)."

Human Feedback Details

  • Uses human feedback: Yes
  • Feedback types: Pairwise Preference
  • Rater population: Not reported
  • Expertise required: General

Evaluation Details

  • Evaluation modes: Automatic Metrics
  • Agentic eval: None
  • Quality controls: Not reported
  • Evidence quality: Moderate
  • Use this page as: Secondary protocol comparison source

Protocol And Measurement Signals

Benchmarks / Datasets

No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.

Reported Metrics

accuracy

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Coffee and tea share many properties, yet they evoke strikingly different situations, atmospheres, and affective associations.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Coffee and tea share many properties, yet they evoke strikingly different situations, atmospheres, and affective associations.
  • These situated dimensions of word meaning are real and systematic, but they remain implicit in most computational representations of lexical meaning.
  • We propose Scene Abstraction, a framework for constructing structured representations of the interpretive scenes that words participate in across usage contexts.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Automatic metrics) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Research Summary

Contribution Summary

  • We propose Scene Abstraction, a framework for constructing structured representations of the interpretive scenes that words participate in across usage contexts.
  • Our contributions are three-fold: (1) a structured representation framework for situated lexical meaning; (2) COCA-Scenes, a dataset of 520 usage instances across 26 keywords for distinct scene identification; and (3) empirical evidence…

Why It Matters For Eval

  • Our contributions are three-fold: (1) a structured representation framework for situated lexical meaning; (2) COCA-Scenes, a dataset of 520 usage instances across 26 keywords for distinct scene identification; and (3) empirical evidence…

Researcher Checklist

  • Pass: Human feedback protocol is explicit

    Detected: Pairwise Preference

  • Pass: Evaluation mode is explicit

    Detected: Automatic Metrics

  • Gap: Quality control reporting appears

    No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.

  • Gap: Benchmark or dataset anchors are present

    No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.

  • Pass: Metric reporting is present

    Detected: accuracy

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Create Account & Post a Job
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
Learn About Managed Service
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.
Join Now