Human Feedback Types
provisional (inferred)None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"LLM-based multi-agent systems exhibit strong collaborative capabilities but often suffer from redundant communication and excessive token overhead."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Ruijia Zhang, Xinyan Zhao, Ruixiang Wang, Sigen Chen +4 more
Published
Aug 15, 2025
Citations
0
Trust level
Provisional
Usefulness score
Unavailable
Extraction confidence
0% (Provisional)
Derived from abstract and metadata only.
Signals refreshed
Mar 25, 2026
Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.
This page is a lightweight research summary built from the abstract and metadata while deeper extraction catches up.
All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.
What to verify
Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.
Main weakness
This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.
Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
LLM-based multi-agent systems exhibit strong collaborative capabilities but often suffer from redundant communication and excessive token overhead. Existing methods typically enhance efficiency through pretrained GNNs or greedy algorithms, but often isolate pre- and post-task optimization, lacking a unified strategy. To this end, we present SafeSieve, a progressive and adaptive multi-agent pruning algorithm that dynamically refines the inter-agent communication through a novel dual-mechanism. SafeSieve integrates initial LLM-based semantic evaluation with accumulated performance feedback, enabling a smooth transition from heuristic initialization to experience-driven refinement. Unlike existing greedy Top-k pruning methods, SafeSieve employs 0-extension clustering to preserve structurally coherent agent groups while eliminating ineffective links. Experiments across benchmarks (SVAMP, HumanEval, etc.) showcase that SafeSieve achieves 94.01% average accuracy while reducing token usage by 12.4%-27.8%. Results further demonstrate robustness under prompt injection attacks (1.23% average accuracy drop). In heterogeneous settings, SafeSieve reduces deployment costs by 13.3% while maintaining performance. These results establish SafeSieve as an efficient, GPU-free, and scalable framework for practical multi-agent systems. Our code can be found here: https://github.com/csgen/SafeSieve
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"LLM-based multi-agent systems exhibit strong collaborative capabilities but often suffer from redundant communication and excessive token overhead."
Automatic metrics
Includes extracted eval setup.
"LLM-based multi-agent systems exhibit strong collaborative capabilities but often suffer from redundant communication and excessive token overhead."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"LLM-based multi-agent systems exhibit strong collaborative capabilities but often suffer from redundant communication and excessive token overhead."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"LLM-based multi-agent systems exhibit strong collaborative capabilities but often suffer from redundant communication and excessive token overhead."
Accuracy
Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.
"Experiments across benchmarks (SVAMP, HumanEval, etc.) showcase that SafeSieve achieves 94.01% average accuracy while reducing token usage by 12.4%-27.8%."
Unknown
Rater source not explicitly reported.
"LLM-based multi-agent systems exhibit strong collaborative capabilities but often suffer from redundant communication and excessive token overhead."
This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.
Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.
LLM-based multi-agent systems exhibit strong collaborative capabilities but often suffer from redundant communication and excessive token overhead.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.