Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies
← Back to explorer

KVDrive: A Holistic Multi-Tier KV Cache Management System for Long-Context LLM Inference

Jian Lin, Jiazhi Mi, Zicong Hong, Haodong Wang, Qianli Liu, Haodyue Zhang, Peng Li, Song Guo · May 18, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Provisional trust

This page is a lightweight research summary built from the abstract and metadata while deeper extraction catches up.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Provisional

Derived from abstract and metadata only.

Abstract

Supporting long-context LLMs is challenging due to the substantial memory demands of the key-value (KV) cache. Existing offloading systems store the full cache in host memory and selectively fetch critical entries during decoding, but this strategy quickly hits a ceiling: sparsity cannot be pushed further without degrading accuracy. As a result, when context length and batch size grow, the volume of KV transfers rises sharply and becomes the dominant source of decoding latency. We present KVDrive, a holistic multi-tier KV cache management system spanning GPU memory, host DRAM, and SSD. Unlike prior work that pursues greater sparsity through algorithmic refinements, KVDrive tackles the problem from a systems perspective - jointly orchestrating cache placement, pipeline scheduling, and cross-tier coordination to sustain high-throughput inference under tight GPU budgets. KVDrive advances three fundamental capabilities: it adapts cache management to attention behavior to maximize reuse and minimize redundant data movement; it restructures the decoding pipeline to overlap I/O- and CPU/GPU compute-bound stages, eliminating stalls across heterogeneous resources; and it harmonizes data movement across memory tiers to unlock scalable long-context inference far beyond GPU and DRAM limits. We have implemented a fully functional prototype of KVDrive and evaluated it on long-context benchmarks with popular LLMs. The system achieves up to 1.74x higher throughput compared to state-of-the-art works while preserving accuracy.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

  • This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Trust level

Provisional

Usefulness score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

Usefulness for eval research

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence 0%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

provisional (inferred)

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Supporting long-context LLMs is challenging due to the substantial memory demands of the key-value (KV) cache."

Evaluation Modes

provisional (inferred)

Automatic metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"Supporting long-context LLMs is challenging due to the substantial memory demands of the key-value (KV) cache."

Quality Controls

provisional (inferred)

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Supporting long-context LLMs is challenging due to the substantial memory demands of the key-value (KV) cache."

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Supporting long-context LLMs is challenging due to the substantial memory demands of the key-value (KV) cache."

Reported Metrics

provisional (inferred)

Accuracy

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"Existing offloading systems store the full cache in host memory and selectively fetch critical entries during decoding, but this strategy quickly hits a ceiling: sparsity cannot be pushed further without degrading accuracy."

Rater Population

provisional (inferred)

Unknown

Rater source not explicitly reported.

"Supporting long-context LLMs is challenging due to the substantial memory demands of the key-value (KV) cache."

Human Feedback Details

This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Details

Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.

  • Potential evaluation modes: Automatic metrics
  • Potential metric signals: Accuracy
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Supporting long-context LLMs is challenging due to the substantial memory demands of the key-value (KV) cache.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Supporting long-context LLMs is challenging due to the substantial memory demands of the key-value (KV) cache.
  • Existing offloading systems store the full cache in host memory and selectively fetch critical entries during decoding, but this strategy quickly hits a ceiling: sparsity cannot be pushed further without degrading accuracy.
  • As a result, when context length and batch size grow, the volume of KV transfers rises sharply and becomes the dominant source of decoding latency.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Automatic metrics) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.