Human Feedback Types
missingNone explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Large Language Models (LLMs) have evolved into AI agents that interact with external tools and environments to perform complex tasks."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Christoph Bühler, Matteo Biagiola, Luca Di Grazia, Guido Salvaneschi
Published
Oct 24, 2025
Citations
0
Trust level
Low
Usefulness score
25/100 (Low)
Extraction confidence
45% (Low)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Apr 24, 2026
This paper is adjacent to HFEPX scope and is best used for background context, not as a primary protocol reference.
Use this as background context only. Do not make protocol decisions from this page alone.
Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.
What to verify
Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.
Main weakness
The available metadata is too thin to trust this as a primary source.
Treat as adjacent context, not a core eval-method reference.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Large Language Models (LLMs) have evolved into AI agents that interact with external tools and environments to perform complex tasks. The Model Context Protocol (MCP) has become the de facto standard for connecting agents with such resources, but security has lagged behind: thousands of MCP servers execute with unrestricted access to host systems, creating a broad attack surface. In this paper, we introduce AgentBound, the first access control framework for MCP servers. AgentBound combines a declarative policy mechanism, inspired by the Android permission model, with a policy enforcement engine that contains malicious behavior without requiring MCP server modifications. We build a dataset containing the 296 most popular MCP servers, and show that access control policies can be generated automatically from source code with 80.9% accuracy. We also show that AgentBound blocks the majority of security threats in several malicious MCP servers, and that the policy enforcement engine introduces negligible overhead. Our contributions provide developers and project managers with a foundation for securing MCP servers while maintaining productivity, enabling researchers and tool builders to explore new directions for declarative access control and MCP security.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Large Language Models (LLMs) have evolved into AI agents that interact with external tools and environments to perform complex tasks."
Automatic Metrics
Includes extracted eval setup.
"Large Language Models (LLMs) have evolved into AI agents that interact with external tools and environments to perform complex tasks."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Large Language Models (LLMs) have evolved into AI agents that interact with external tools and environments to perform complex tasks."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"Large Language Models (LLMs) have evolved into AI agents that interact with external tools and environments to perform complex tasks."
Accuracy
Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.
"We build a dataset containing the 296 most popular MCP servers, and show that access control policies can be generated automatically from source code with 80.9% accuracy."
No benchmark or dataset names were extracted from the available abstract.
Large Language Models (LLMs) have evolved into AI agents that interact with external tools and environments to perform complex tasks.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
No explicit human feedback protocol detected.
Evaluation mode is explicit
Detected: Automatic Metrics
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
No benchmark/dataset anchor extracted from abstract.
Metric reporting is present
Detected: accuracy