Human Feedback Types
provisional (inferred)None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Context engineering has emerged as a primary lever for improving AI systems without parameter updates."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Ziyi Zhu, Luka Smyth, Saki Shinoda, Jinghong Chen
Published
Jun 17, 2026
Citations
0
Trust level
Provisional
Usefulness score
Unavailable
Extraction confidence
0% (Provisional)
Derived from abstract and metadata only.
Signals refreshed
Jun 17, 2026
Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.
This page is a lightweight research summary built from the abstract and metadata while deeper extraction catches up.
All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.
Best use
Background context only
Use if you need
A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.
What to verify
Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.
Main weakness
This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.
Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Context engineering has emerged as a primary lever for improving AI systems without parameter updates. Recent work showing that textual gradients do not function as real gradients motivates treating automatic prompt optimization (APO) as black-box search. We introduce SPO (Stochastic Prompt Optimization), a framework for stochastic search over prompt space, and compare three strategies of increasing sophistication: error-informed random search, a genetic algorithm with evolutionary operators, and SAGE (SPO via Agent-Guided Exploration), a multi-agent pipeline with diagnostic code execution. Across three benchmarks, no single strategy dominates; effectiveness depends on the interaction of landscape structure with error type. We further deploy SAGE on a mental-health chatbot under a continuous optimization paradigm, where it compounds eight cycles of individually-noisy A/B tests into a statistically robust gain in next-day retention. We argue that coupling qualitative diagnosis with quantitative validation is what makes agentic optimization effective for open-ended task-oriented dialogue.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
None explicit
No explicit feedback protocol extracted.
"Context engineering has emerged as a primary lever for improving AI systems without parameter updates."
None explicit
Validate eval design from full paper text.
"Context engineering has emerged as a primary lever for improving AI systems without parameter updates."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Context engineering has emerged as a primary lever for improving AI systems without parameter updates."
Not extracted
No benchmark anchors detected.
"Context engineering has emerged as a primary lever for improving AI systems without parameter updates."
Not extracted
No metric anchors detected.
"Context engineering has emerged as a primary lever for improving AI systems without parameter updates."
Unknown
Rater source not explicitly reported.
"Context engineering has emerged as a primary lever for improving AI systems without parameter updates."
This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.
Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.
Context engineering has emerged as a primary lever for improving AI systems without parameter updates.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.