Skip to content
← Back to explorer

A Blueprint for Self-Evolving Coding Agents in Vehicle Aerodynamic Drag Prediction

Jinhui Ren, Huaiming Li, Yabin Liu, Tao Li, Zhaokun Liu, Yujia Liang, Zengle Ge, Chufan Wu, Xiaomin Yuan, Danyu Liu, Annan Li, Jianmin Wu · Mar 23, 2026 · Citations: 0

Data freshness

Extraction: Stale

Check recency before relying on this page for active eval decisions. Use stale pages as context and verify against current hub results.

Metadata refreshed

Mar 23, 2026, 8:36 AM

Stale

Extraction refreshed

Mar 23, 2026, 8:36 AM

Stale

Extraction source

Persisted extraction

Confidence unavailable

Abstract

High-fidelity vehicle drag evaluation is constrained less by solver runtime than by workflow friction: geometry cleanup, meshing retries, queue contention, and reproducibility failures across teams. We present a contract-centric blueprint for self-evolving coding agents that discover executable surrogate pipelines for predicting drag coefficient $C_d$ under industrial constraints. The method formulates surrogate discovery as constrained optimization over programs, not static model instances, and combines Famou-Agent-style evaluator feedback with population-based island evolution, structured mutations (data, model, loss, and split policies), and multi-objective selection balancing ranking quality, stability, and cost. A hard evaluation contract enforces leakage prevention, deterministic replay, multi-seed robustness, and resource budgets before any candidate is admitted. Across eight anonymized evolutionary operators, the best system reaches a Combined Score of 0.9335 with sign-accuracy 0.9180, while trajectory and ablation analyses show that adaptive sampling and island migration are primary drivers of convergence quality. The deployment model is explicitly ``screen-and-escalate'': surrogates provide high-throughput ranking for design exploration, but low-confidence or out-of-distribution cases are automatically escalated to high-fidelity CFD. The resulting contribution is an auditable, reusable workflow for accelerating aerodynamic design iteration while preserving decision-grade reliability, governance traceability, and safety boundaries.

Low-signal caution for protocol decisions

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

HFEPX Relevance Assessment

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

Trust level

Provisional

Eval-Fit Score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

HFEPX Fit

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence: Provisional

Field Provenance & Confidence

Each key protocol field shows extraction state, confidence band, and data source so you can decide whether to trust it directly or validate from full text.

Human Feedback Types

provisional

None explicit

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

Evidence snippet: High-fidelity vehicle drag evaluation is constrained less by solver runtime than by workflow friction: geometry cleanup, meshing retries, queue contention, and reproducibility failures across teams.

Evaluation Modes

provisional

Automatic metrics

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Includes extracted eval setup.

Evidence snippet: High-fidelity vehicle drag evaluation is constrained less by solver runtime than by workflow friction: geometry cleanup, meshing retries, queue contention, and reproducibility failures across teams.

Quality Controls

provisional

Not reported

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No explicit QC controls found.

Evidence snippet: High-fidelity vehicle drag evaluation is constrained less by solver runtime than by workflow friction: geometry cleanup, meshing retries, queue contention, and reproducibility failures across teams.

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional

Not extracted

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

No benchmark anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: High-fidelity vehicle drag evaluation is constrained less by solver runtime than by workflow friction: geometry cleanup, meshing retries, queue contention, and reproducibility failures across teams.

Reported Metrics

provisional

Accuracy

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

Evidence snippet: Across eight anonymized evolutionary operators, the best system reaches a Combined Score of 0.9335 with sign-accuracy 0.9180, while trajectory and ablation analyses show that adaptive sampling and island migration are primary drivers of convergence quality.

Rater Population

provisional

Unknown

Confidence: Provisional Source: Persisted extraction inferred

Rater source not explicitly reported.

Evidence snippet: High-fidelity vehicle drag evaluation is constrained less by solver runtime than by workflow friction: geometry cleanup, meshing retries, queue contention, and reproducibility failures across teams.

Human Data Lens

Structured extraction is still processing. Below are provisional signals inferred from abstract text only.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Lens

Evaluation fields are currently inferred heuristically from abstract text.

  • Potential evaluation modes: Automatic metrics
  • Potential metric signals: Accuracy
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Deterministic synthesis

High-fidelity vehicle drag evaluation is constrained less by solver runtime than by workflow friction: geometry cleanup, meshing retries, queue contention, and reproducibility failures across teams.

Generated Mar 23, 2026, 8:36 AM · Grounded in abstract + metadata only

Key Takeaways

  • High-fidelity vehicle drag evaluation is constrained less by solver runtime than by workflow friction: geometry cleanup, meshing retries, queue contention, and reproducibility failures across teams.
  • We present a contract-centric blueprint for self-evolving coding agents that discover executable surrogate pipelines for predicting drag coefficient $C_d$ under industrial constraints.
  • The method formulates surrogate discovery as constrained optimization over programs, not static model instances, and combines Famou-Agent-style evaluator feedback with population-based island evolution, structured mutations (data, model, loss, and split policies), and multi-objective selection balancing ranking quality, stability, and cost.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Automatic metrics) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.