Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Your Classifier Can Do More: Towards Balancing the Gaps in Classification, Robustness, and Generation

Kaichao Jiang, He Wang, Xiaoshuai Hao, Xiulong Yang, Ajian Liu, Qi Chu, Yunfeng Diao, Richang Hong · May 26, 2025 · Citations: 0

How to use this paper page

Coverage: Stale

Use this page to decide whether the paper is strong enough to influence an eval design. It summarizes the abstract plus available structured metadata. If the signal is thin, use it as background context and compare it against stronger hub pages before making protocol choices.

Best use

Background context only

Metadata: Stale

Trust level

Provisional

Signals: Stale

What still needs checking

Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

Signal confidence unavailable

Abstract

Joint Energy-based Models (JEMs) are well known for their ability to unify classification and generation within a single framework. Despite their promising generative and discriminative performance, their robustness remains far inferior to adversarial training (AT), which, conversely, achieves strong robustness but sacrifices clean accuracy and lacks generative ability. This inherent trilemma-balancing classification accuracy, robustness, and generative capability-raises a fundamental question: Can a single model achieve all three simultaneously? To answer this, we conduct a systematic energy landscape analysis of clean, adversarial, and generated samples across various JEM and AT variants. We observe that AT reduces the energy gap between clean and adversarial samples, while JEMs narrow the gap between clean and synthetic ones. This observation suggests a key insight: if the energy distributions of all three data types can be aligned, we might bridge their performance disparities. Building on this idea, we propose Energy-based Joint Distribution Adversarial Training (EB-JDAT), a unified generative-discriminative-robust framework that maximizes the joint probability of clean and adversarial distribution. EB-JDAT introduces a novel min-max energy optimization to explicitly aligning energies across clean, adversarial, and generated samples. Extensive experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet subsets demonstrate that EB-JDAT achieves state-of-the-art robustness while maintaining near-original accuracy and competitive generation quality of JEMs, effectively achieving a new trade-off frontier between accuracy, robustness, and generation. The code is released at https://github.com/yujkc/EB-JDAT.

Use caution before copying this protocol

Use this page for context, then validate protocol choices against stronger HFEPX references before implementation decisions.

  • Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

HFEPX Relevance Assessment

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

Structured extraction is still processing; current fields are metadata-first.

Trust level

Provisional

Eval-Fit Score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

HFEPX Fit

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence: Provisional

What This Page Found In The Paper

Each field below shows whether the signal looked explicit, partial, or missing in the available metadata. Use this to judge what is safe to trust directly and what still needs full-paper validation.

Human Feedback Types

provisional

None explicit

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

Evidence snippet: Joint Energy-based Models (JEMs) are well known for their ability to unify classification and generation within a single framework.

Evaluation Modes

provisional

Automatic metrics

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

Includes extracted eval setup.

Evidence snippet: Joint Energy-based Models (JEMs) are well known for their ability to unify classification and generation within a single framework.

Quality Controls

provisional

Not reported

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

No explicit QC controls found.

Evidence snippet: Joint Energy-based Models (JEMs) are well known for their ability to unify classification and generation within a single framework.

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional

Not extracted

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

No benchmark anchors detected.

Evidence snippet: Joint Energy-based Models (JEMs) are well known for their ability to unify classification and generation within a single framework.

Reported Metrics

provisional

Accuracy

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

Evidence snippet: Despite their promising generative and discriminative performance, their robustness remains far inferior to adversarial training (AT), which, conversely, achieves strong robustness but sacrifices clean accuracy and lacks generative ability.

Rater Population

provisional

Unknown

Confidence: Provisional Best-effort inference

Rater source not explicitly reported.

Evidence snippet: Joint Energy-based Models (JEMs) are well known for their ability to unify classification and generation within a single framework.

Human Data Lens

This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Lens

Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.

  • Potential evaluation modes: Automatic metrics
  • Potential metric signals: Accuracy
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Joint Energy-based Models (JEMs) are well known for their ability to unify classification and generation within a single framework.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Joint Energy-based Models (JEMs) are well known for their ability to unify classification and generation within a single framework.
  • Despite their promising generative and discriminative performance, their robustness remains far inferior to adversarial training (AT), which, conversely, achieves strong robustness but sacrifices clean accuracy and lacks generative ability.
  • This inherent trilemma-balancing classification accuracy, robustness, and generative capability-raises a fundamental question: Can a single model achieve all three simultaneously?

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Automatic metrics) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.