Human Feedback Types
strongDemonstrations
Directly usable for protocol triage.
"Enhancing LLMs with the ability to actively search external knowledge is crucial for complex and real-world tasks."
HFEPX · Eval paper review
Chenyang Gu, Yewen Pu, Bruce Yang, Xiaofan Li +1 more
Published
Oct 10, 2025
Citations
0
Trust level
High
Usefulness score
67/100 (Medium)
Extraction confidence
75% (High)
Derived from extracted protocol signals and abstract evidence.
Rater population
Not reported
Signals refreshed
Mar 19, 2026
This paper has useful evaluation signal, but protocol completeness is partial; pair it with related papers before deciding implementation strategy.
Use this as a practical starting point for protocol research, then validate against the original paper.
Best use
Secondary protocol comparison source
Use if you need
A secondary eval reference to pair with stronger protocol papers.
What to verify
Validate the evaluation procedure and quality controls in the full paper before operational use.
Main weakness
No major weakness surfaced.
Useful as a secondary reference; validate protocol details against neighboring papers.
If you are doing eval pipeline work, start here
Enhancing LLMs with the ability to actively search external knowledge is crucial for complex and real-world tasks. Current approaches either rely on prompting to elicit the model's innate agent capabilities, or suffer from performance ceilings and collapse when applying RL to complex interactive tasks, leaving their true agentic potential untapped. To address this, we introduce \textbf{D}ynamic-filter \textbf{S}equence-level \textbf{P}olicy \textbf{O}ptimization (DSPO), an improved RL algorithm designed for robust agent training through sequence-level optimization and dynamic sample filtering. We train our model purely through RL to interleave multi-turn search and reasoning, obviating the need for supervised demonstration data. Across multiple QA benchmarks, our 7B model improves over a comparable previous work by \textbf{34.1\%}, and even outperforms the 14B model from previous work in complex multihop QA such as HotpotQA by nearly \textbf{9\% relative}, maintaining exceptional training stability.
These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.
Demonstrations
Directly usable for protocol triage.
"Enhancing LLMs with the ability to actively search external knowledge is crucial for complex and real-world tasks."
Simulation Env
Includes extracted eval setup.
"Enhancing LLMs with the ability to actively search external knowledge is crucial for complex and real-world tasks."
Not reported
No explicit QC controls found.
"Enhancing LLMs with the ability to actively search external knowledge is crucial for complex and real-world tasks."
HotpotQA
Useful for quick benchmark comparison.
"Across multiple QA benchmarks, our 7B model improves over a comparable previous work by \textbf{34.1\%}, and even outperforms the 14B model from previous work in complex multihop QA such as HotpotQA by nearly \textbf{9\% relative}, maintaining exceptional training stability."
Not extracted
No metric anchors detected.
"Enhancing LLMs with the ability to actively search external knowledge is crucial for complex and real-world tasks."
No metric terms were extracted from the available abstract.
Enhancing LLMs with the ability to actively search external knowledge is crucial for complex and real-world tasks.
Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.
Human feedback protocol is explicit
Detected: Demonstrations
Evaluation mode is explicit
Detected: Simulation Env
Quality control reporting appears
No calibration/adjudication/IAA control explicitly detected.
Benchmark or dataset anchors are present
Detected: HotpotQA
Metric reporting is present
No metric terms extracted.