Skip to content
← Back to explorer

Class Unlearning via Depth-Aware Removal of Forget-Specific Directions

Arman Hatami, Romina Aalishah, Ilya E. Monosov · Apr 16, 2026 · Citations: 0

How to use this page

Provisional trust

This page is a lightweight research summary built from the abstract and metadata while deeper extraction catches up.

Best use

Background context only

What to verify

Read the full paper before copying any benchmark, metric, or protocol choices.

Evidence quality

Provisional

Derived from abstract and metadata only.

Abstract

Machine unlearning aims to remove targeted knowledge from a trained model without the cost of retraining from scratch. In class unlearning, however, reducing accuracy on forget classes does not necessarily imply true forgetting: forgotten information can remain encoded in internal representations, and apparent forgetting may arise from classifier-head suppression rather than representational removal. We show that existing class-unlearning methods often exhibit weak or negative selectivity, preserve forget-class structure in deep representations, or rely heavily on final-layer bias shifts. We then introduce DAMP (Depth-Aware Modulation by Projection), a one-shot, closed-form weight-surgery method that removes forget-specific directions from a pretrained network without gradient-based optimization. At each stage, DAMP computes class prototypes in the input space of the next learnable operator, extracts forget directions as residuals relative to retain-class prototypes, and applies a projection-based update to reduce downstream sensitivity to those directions. To preserve utility, DAMP uses a parameter-free depth-aware scaling rule derived from probe separability, applying smaller edits in early layers and larger edits in deeper layers. The method naturally extends to multi-class forgetting through low-rank subspace removal. Across MNIST, CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny ImageNet, and across convolutional and transformer architectures, DAMP more closely resembles the retraining gold standard than some of the prior methods, improving selective forgetting while better preserving retain-class performance and reducing residual forget-class structure in deep layers.

Abstract-only analysis — low confidence

All signals on this page are inferred from the abstract only and may be inaccurate. Do not use this page as a primary protocol reference.

  • This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Should You Rely On This Paper?

Signal extraction is still processing. This page currently shows metadata-first guidance until structured protocol fields are ready.

Best use

Background context only

Use if you need

A provisional background reference while structured extraction finishes.

Main weakness

This page is still relying on abstract and metadata signals, not a fuller protocol read.

Trust level

Provisional

Usefulness score

Unavailable

Eval-fit score is unavailable until extraction completes.

Human Feedback Signal

Not explicit in abstract metadata

Evaluation Signal

Weak / implicit signal

Usefulness for eval research

Provisional (processing)

Extraction confidence 0%

What We Could Verify

These are the protocol signals we could actually recover from the available paper metadata. Use them to decide whether this paper is worth deeper reading.

Human Feedback Types

provisional (inferred)

None explicit

No explicit feedback protocol extracted.

"Machine unlearning aims to remove targeted knowledge from a trained model without the cost of retraining from scratch."

Evaluation Modes

provisional (inferred)

Automatic metrics

Includes extracted eval setup.

"Machine unlearning aims to remove targeted knowledge from a trained model without the cost of retraining from scratch."

Quality Controls

provisional (inferred)

Not reported

No explicit QC controls found.

"Machine unlearning aims to remove targeted knowledge from a trained model without the cost of retraining from scratch."

Benchmarks / Datasets

provisional (inferred)

Not extracted

No benchmark anchors detected.

"Machine unlearning aims to remove targeted knowledge from a trained model without the cost of retraining from scratch."

Reported Metrics

provisional (inferred)

Accuracy

Useful for evaluation criteria comparison.

"In class unlearning, however, reducing accuracy on forget classes does not necessarily imply true forgetting: forgotten information can remain encoded in internal representations, and apparent forgetting may arise from classifier-head suppression rather than representational removal."

Rater Population

provisional (inferred)

Unknown

Rater source not explicitly reported.

"Machine unlearning aims to remove targeted knowledge from a trained model without the cost of retraining from scratch."

Human Feedback Details

This page is using abstract-level cues only right now. Treat the signals below as provisional.

  • Potential human-data signal: No explicit human-data keywords detected.
  • Potential benchmark anchors: No benchmark names detected in abstract.
  • Abstract highlights: 3 key sentence(s) extracted below.

Evaluation Details

Evaluation fields are inferred from the abstract only.

  • Potential evaluation modes: Automatic metrics
  • Potential metric signals: Accuracy
  • Confidence: Provisional (metadata-only fallback).

Research Brief

Metadata summary

Machine unlearning aims to remove targeted knowledge from a trained model without the cost of retraining from scratch.

Based on abstract + metadata only. Check the source paper before making high-confidence protocol decisions.

Key Takeaways

  • Machine unlearning aims to remove targeted knowledge from a trained model without the cost of retraining from scratch.
  • In class unlearning, however, reducing accuracy on forget classes does not necessarily imply true forgetting: forgotten information can remain encoded in internal representations, and apparent forgetting may arise from classifier-head suppression rather than representational removal.
  • We show that existing class-unlearning methods often exhibit weak or negative selectivity, preserve forget-class structure in deep representations, or rely heavily on final-layer bias shifts.

Researcher Actions

  • Compare this paper against nearby papers in the same arXiv category before using it for protocol decisions.
  • Validate inferred eval signals (Automatic metrics) against the full paper.
  • Use related-paper links to find stronger protocol-specific references.

Caveats

  • Generated from abstract + metadata only; no PDF parsing.
  • Signals below are heuristic and may miss details reported outside the abstract.

Recommended Queries

Related Papers

Papers are ranked by protocol overlap, extraction signal alignment, and semantic proximity.

No related papers found for this item yet.

Get Started

Join the #1 Platform for AI Training Talent

Where top AI builders and expert AI Trainers connect to build the future of AI.
Self-Service
Post a Job
Post your project and get a shortlist of qualified AI Trainers and Data Labelers. Hire and manage your team in the tools you already use.
Managed Service
For Large Projects
Done-for-You
We recruit, onboard, and manage a dedicated team inside your tools. End-to-end operations for large or complex projects.
For Freelancers
Join as an AI Trainer
Find AI training and data labeling projects across platforms, all in one place. One profile, one application process, more opportunities.